User talk:McLongShlong

April 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} Spicy (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

McLongShlong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know my username is offensive, I will be more than happy to change it and how to do so.McLongShlong (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To propose a new username and be unblocked, please follow the instructions in the block notice above, including reading the policies linked to therein. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Changing your offensive username would not change the fact that you have also been blocked as a vandalism-only account. Meters (talk) 01:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to have my account unblocked as a vandalism-only account McLongShlong (talk) 04:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

McLongShlong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

McBurger (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My username was offensive McLongShlong (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Yes, deliberately so. And your edits were inappropriate, too. Best we leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I only fixed typo’s and changed some vocabulary but didn’t change the entire story/info/context. McLongShlong (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please show me where I said something inappropriate in a article I edited. McLongShlong (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How about: introducing a typo [1], [2] or adding unnecessary space [3] or "a" and "the" where not needed. You seem to have lost trust with such edits. That, and the fact that most of your edits are not really improvements, just substituting various synonyms (fact of/reality of, rapid/quick, journey/trip, "lost at sea"/"yielded at sea" (?), basic/primary, enemies/rivals, part/role, etc.) Top it off with a predictably offensive user name, and it seems the Wikipedia community finds it increasingly difficult to assume good faith. _signed,Willondon (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]