User talk:Metropolinx

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aeroméxico destinations. Your previous messages regarding this very same behaviour of yours are kept in your talk page history, there is no point in deleting them. If you keep removing material from articles without a valid explanation in your edit summaries or a prior discussion at any talk page I will report you at WP:ANI.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at VivaAerobús destinations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mexico City International Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. According to WP:VERIFY you must provide a source for the airport now being a hub for VivaAerobus. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cubana de Aviación, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnicharters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Merida and Chihuahua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blue Panorama Airlines

added a link pointing to Neos

InterCaribbean Airways

added a link pointing to Philipsburg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cubana de Aviación. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andrewgprout. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to O'Hare International Airport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not delete references that support the detail being supported Andrewgprout (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing references

Please don't remove valid references to destinations, even if the flight has already commened. There have been numerous discussions about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports, and while this behavior used to be an okay practice, it is now looked down upon. Thanks. 172.58.43.252 (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "messy" references

Stop removing references from tables. When a route starts, remove just the date. This goes against Wikipedia policies, just because it is "messy". Everything needs to be verifiable. You were warned above and if you continue, you will be reported. Garretka (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Garretka (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

If you make more of the same sort of disputed edits like that without discussing things at talk pages first, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please, stop. Discuss. Speak to us. Explain. We are friendly. We know you talk English because your edit summaries are in English. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

When your block expires, please do not continue with these sorts of edits. Again: Discuss. Speak to us. Explain. We are friendly. Even while you are blocked, you can post here and talk. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Start/End Dates Before the Actual Date

Hello Metropolinx! I wanted to talk with you about your removing of start and end dates before the actual date, which is causing a lot of conflict (i.e. you being blocked). I have been lenient in the past and let your edits removing start/end dates go, but I know other users feel much more strongly about this. Please wait until the date that a route begins/ends to remove the note, using Zulu or the timezone of the airport would be acceptable. I would be glad to help you in the future, just ping me, as you generally make a lot of constructive edits to Aviation articles. Thanks! Stinger20 (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for logging out to make problematic edits as an IP address. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting, especially after you were recently blocked for similar editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socking with IPs

Talk to me. Please do not go down this road. You are about to be blocked indefinitely. You do not want that. The best plan for you is to talk to me here. I can help you understand how to make edits that are not reverted. That is what you want. If you just use an IP, your edits will be reverted always and you will be blocked indefinitely. You don't want that. Talk to me here. I can help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You just made another edit with that IP. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. You are still welcome to discuss things here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Metropolinx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19018 was submitted on Aug 17, 2017 17:11:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]