User talk:Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas

Welcome!

Hello, Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am your mentor and you can ask me any questions on my talk page or check out our help pages if you need help. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Play the The Wikipedia Adventure
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
Remember to cite reliable sources
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 13:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Security and personal reasons. Please contact me to submit information about this statement, which I can not disclose publicly, and give additional insight on why I deem necessary not to disclose on user pages. Additionally, socketpuppetry was never used to influence, vote on quality images, self comment and such, in favor for one or the other. I specifically just use one for Wikimedia, and the other for Wikipedia/Wikidata. You can verify internally my history on editing and voting on both. And finally, this is just to clarify, bring forth my situation. I'm a new wiki editor (one year) and even when there is a lot for me to learn, the persons advocating for my block never assumed fair intent even when I accepted it, obviously, since I did nothing wrong while using both, and specified I never did this with intent to tip balance of scale or anything. I hope this time I may be able to explain in a personal, privately manner my security reasons and personal views behind having two separate accounts for two wikis. Before anything I firstly seek to contact whoever is in charge so that my situation is first reviewed. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request placed in a section header. All edits should be placed in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header window. You can avoid creating section headers entirely by clicking "edit" and not "add topic". 331dot (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Security and personal reasons. Please contact me to submit information about this statement, which I can not disclose publicly, and give additional insight on why I deem necessary not to disclose on user pages. Additionally, socketpuppetry was never used to influence, vote on quality images, self comment and such, in favor for one or the other. I specifically just use one for Wikimedia, and the other for Wikipedia/Wikidata. You can verify internally my history on editing and voting on both. And finally, this is just to clarify, bring forth my situation. I'm a new wiki editor (one year) and even when there is a lot for me to learn, the persons advocating for my block never assumed fair intent even when I accepted it, obviously, since I did nothing wrong while using both, and specified I never did this with intent to tip balance of scale or anything. I hope this time I may be able to explain in a personal, privately manner my security reasons and personal views behind having two separate accounts for two wikis. Before anything I firstly seek to contact whoever is in charge so that my situation is first reviewed. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. Please use WP:UTRS to make a private unblock request. 331dot (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.