User talk:MontgomeryDalton

Crossfire

-Snip-

Tl;dr

An incident where I removed vandalism (virus infected links / untrustworthy websites) as well as irrelevant sources not pertaining to the information stated.

I received large amounts of flak from senior members of the community over "unclear summaries" which was completely ridiculous as I didn't leave some stub in the edit summaries.

I gave legitimate reasons and cleaned the page responsibly.

"Use the talk page" they said.

Why? Infected links and irrelevant sources don't offer anything and are vandalism.

I don't know. What with getting personally attacked on the page within a short timespan, then returning the personal attack, only to be the only one getting WP:Personal Attacks sanctions or whatever.

Serious "misunderstanding" consisting of elitists not listening to newer users.

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Saga

Please stop attacking anyone who attempts to edit the Lost Saga page, furthermore please stop attempting to remove any criticism on the page or anything you do no personally place in the articles. If other users have put it there, it is for a reason. Glorifying something is not what Wikipedia is for, it for stating facts and common knowledge about things. If you wish to glorify your favourite game, please make a Fansite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temptoss1 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"No personal attacks." Right. Because I made a personal attack. /sarcasm. You're the one abusing the system by throwing around the "personal attack card" even though nothing of the sort happened. Your edits get removed for reasons given in edit summaries, I suggest you read them.

"Please stop attempting to remove any criticism on the page... or anything you do no personally place in the articles. If other users have put it there, it is for a reason."

Oh, that's right, because, poorly structured thoughts which were so ambiguous that I had absolutely no idea what you wanted to write or even just simply express, NEEDS to stay on the page. On the premises that you were talking crap about the previous host, THAT WITHIN ITSELF, is biased. I've not stated that "OMFG, Z8GAMES IS THE BEST PUBLISHER IN THE WHOLE ENTIRE WORLD, LOST SAGA IS THE BEST GAME, BETTER THAN ALL MOBA's COMBINED," on the page, nor did I ever state: "OMFG. THIS GAME SUCKS. IT NEEDS TO SHUT DOWN BECAUSE IT'S A WASTE OF TIME, ENERGY AND MONEY, more bias rage here."

That's unprofessional. Your biased comments have been removed for bias. Don't pull any of those [Wikipedia:] cards on me when I know what I'm doing. Also, redundancy on the premises which I spoke about the previous publisher in the introduction, prior to them transferring rights. There was absolutely no need to bring them up a second time if they had nothing to contribute to the article. You dragging the former publisher "through the mud" just because you're some troll vandal, isn't funny, nor is it neutral.

I'm sick of everyone picking fights with me.

I ACTUALLY WANT TO LEARN HOW TO USE WIKIPEDIA PROPERLY so I can write articles or whatnot, but I know I'm not some isolated case of systematic abuse, so I'm beginning to question if I should just move on to some other project, like learning more (and actually useful) coding languages.

Have a nice day vandal.

"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki#Security" read it.

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 02:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 05:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A) Never made any claims of ownership. Don't mistake pride for ownership.

B) Claimed I was lead author. That's a Wikipedia concept, there's nothing wrong with that.

C) I make edits. Yes, nothing wrong with that. Others make edits, nothing wrong with that. Attacking, berating and scolding me over dealing with vandalism is not correct however. People wonder why nobody likes Wikipedia or using it.

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a game of vandalism. RE: Wikipedia Is Not A Game Of King Of The Hill

Dear Temptoss1.

It is to my understanding that you lack the understanding of precisely why I kept undoing your edits. Simply put, Wikipedia is not a game of vandalism. Perceiving that A) I either hate you, B) I'm a "vandal", C) I'm "bigoted" in some manner or form...

This is unacceptable. Just as unacceptable as receiving "[Wikipedia:Personal Attacks]" despite not actually initiating a fight.

You perceiving some imaginary fight, where I made some imaginary hurtful personal attack, is not acceptable behaviour.

Things get removed for reasons. BOLD, Revert, Discuss. If you feel my stressing of the utilization of English only information (not sources (when possible)) is bigoted, hurtful, or a personal attack, I implore you learn what a personal attack is, by actually reading the Wikipedia:Personal Attack page.

I think we covered this, didn't we? Wikipedia:BRD

Let me clearly define vandalism of pages for you, quoted from the majestic rule book you seem so keen on poorly quoting.

"For example, vandalism (changing wiki content to something offensive, adding nonsense or deliberately adding incorrect information) can be a major problem." -"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki#Security"

Furthermore, I shall not tolerate the vandalism of my own talk page.

You do not have the right to silence me to make me look bad, nor mitigate my edits of my talk page explaining the normal conduct which I partook in, after individuals have "put me under scrutiny for "attacking other users"", or other nonsense which doesn't actually have a legitimate basis. Have I aggressively made returned comments to users when they start it? Sure.

There's nothing wrong with getting a little heated (especially as a result of the BRD process), but fraudulently throwing around the [Personal Attack Card] is wholly unacceptable.

I'm going to start deleting your comments from my page, considering they're nothing more than slanderous attacks without basis, as well as vandalism.

The revision of history is there, people who aren't blind sheeple can read it if they want.

So, sincerely

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just To Inform You

Anybody can view the previous versions of pages, including talk pages, completely removing and changing them doesn't make it so somebody can't see them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temptoss1 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay kid, keep vandalizing not just regular pages, and harassing and vandalizing my page as well.

Why? I don't like seeing walls of bullshit all over my page.

Now, I've said it kindly before. This time, not so much.

Piss off, and leave me alone.

Oh, and, if anybody with any shred of intelligence is able to read, they'll see how much of a p.o.s. you really are for your continued vandalizing and harassment. But that's none of my business.

respectfully,

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 02:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I need it explained to me. How is it vandalism? What is wrong with it, besides the fact that you don't want it included? Reach Out to the Truth 03:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I need to explain how, him constantly harassing me, when I've told him to stop, is not harassment?

I need to explain how, him constantly editing my page in negative manners, either by totally suppressing my statements, or just constantly treating me like garbage isn't harassment or vandalism?

If you want to be mr. Hoity Toity responsible individual, go ahead report him yourself, because no SOB has told me how to report him despite having requested a link or whatever, over and over again. Where the hell is the report button.

I need to explain how, him having constantly attacked and negatively, biasedly, non-factually, and non-neutrally editing the Lost Saga page is vandalism?

I mean, I'm not dense, but what is with everyone on Wikipedia? This is absolutely a miserable experience, no wonder nobody joins. I get attacked over making returned remarks. I get attacked for cleaning up vandalism. I get harassed and I don't know how to stop it, and nobody helps me.

I'm no fan of how I'm being treated here. -5/5 worst community I've ever dealt with.

-MontgomeryDalton (talk) 03:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked a question that I legitimately wanted an answer to. Please assume good faith. I want to try to understand. But it's difficult if you're going to attack me and provide no answers. If you want to explain, I will listen. If you do not want to, you will not hear from me again. Reach Out to the Truth 04:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]