Jump to content

User talk:Mosedschurte/Archive 41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35←Archive 39Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42Archive 43→Archive 45

Leo Ryan GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed Leo Ryan for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

German-Soviet Credit Agreement

Hi, can you look at accuracy concerns raised at User talk:Jo0doe#German–Soviet Credit Agreement (1939). Thanks, Renata (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

FAR

I have nominated Marshall Plan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Beriozka-gastronom.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beriozka-gastronom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

File talk:PeterFechter nextowall.JPG

Hello,

is there a way to make the use of File:PeterFechter nextowall.JPG possible on french Wikipedia ?

Regards

--Hercule (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

Soviet Union

We are attempting a step-by-step overhaul of the article Soviet Union. As you are knowledgeable about Soviet and Eastern Bloc affairs, you are welcome to chime in. Colchicum (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:E-tripartite-pact.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:E-tripartite-pact.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

Archive Indexerbot

I did this bot code removal, since the HBC Archive Indexerbot log reported an error "12:15:27 19 September 2010: Not writing to User talk:Mosedschurte/Archive index as I cannot find permission (sourced from: User talk:Mosedschurte)". Read throught the bot instructions, if you want to still use it. --Kslotte (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:E-tripartite-pact.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:E-tripartite-pact.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

What's going on here? For some reason J Milburn wants to shake the status quo on non-free WW II photos. (See Talk:Battle of Berlin.) I think there should be some centralized discussion somewhere. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 16:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Not necessarily. J Milburn seems just to request the non-free rationale to be modified to comply with the non-free content policy. If the image in actuality depicts a unique historical event, and if this event has a direct relevance to the article's subject (for instance, the photo of the moment of signing of the pact is definitely necessary for the article about this pact), then the image should stay.
However, the possibility exists that similar free image exists, or that this concrete image is in actuality free. In connection to that, it is necessary Mosedschurte to do the following:
  1. To try to found the information about this image. Probably the copyright in actuality had expired;
  2. To look at Bundesarchiv. Probably, similar image can be found there, which is under share-alike license;
  3. To look in the US archives. Probably, something can be found there, which is free.
These three things are necessary to do before we can speak that no free equivalent for this photo exist, and I believe that J Milburn's request is quite justified and correct.--Paul Siebert (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
J Milburn is correct to flag the image for review. What would be less helpful is if he then engages in protracted discussions arguing for the removal of the photo, to the point that it may seem like stonewalling. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mosedschurte/Archive_41&oldid=388921398"