Jump to content

User talk:Moustan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello.

Terrorist

[edit]

I bet you a virtual, imaginary pint of 80/- that your reinsertion of the song about the chicken/pasty supper gets reverted with the complaint that you haven't provided a page number in your citation.80.229.9.98 (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should get reverted as it serves no purpose but to stir sectarian tensions. -RiverHockey (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get it up ye, half the songs listed are pro-Sands, they stir sectarian tensions and yet nothing is done - it's discrimination that anti-Sands songs aren't allowed.

May 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to National Guard of the United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 08:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spellong

[edit]

See this Google search! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

War of 1812 edits

[edit]

You recently made a change to this article, removing a sentence referring to the successes of United States Navy frigates over their Royal Navy counterparts which might be held to be POV although easily verifiable, but nevertheless your edit summary described the change as merely "Spelling".

The War of 1812 article is one of the most contentious and potentially inflammatory in Wikipedia. It is important when editing this article to avoid anything which might lead to accusations of bad faith or POV-pushing. HLGallon (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Moustan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JCutter (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redcap

[edit]

Thank you for your new article Redcap (novel).

As you mentioned in your comments, the article is not yet formatted for wikipedia, but that can easily be fixed.

However, I am wondering if you have reviewed the criteria for notability for books.

A book is generally notable if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria:

  1. The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself...
  2. The book has won a major literary award.
  3. The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement.
  4. The book is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country.
  5. The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable.

Please see Wikipedia:Notability (books) for more details.

If the book meets any of these criteria please consider posting in-line references with those details. See Wikipedia:Cite for details on how to post or hit the talk link next to my name to ask for help.

I am affraid that if the book doesn't meet these criteria then it will likely be proposed for deletion.

JCutter (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]