User talk:Mt Valley

Fair use rationale for Image:TSFC Logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TSFC Logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:TSFC Logo.PNG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:TSFC Logo.png. The copy called Image:TSFC Logo.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After Midnight's talk page

In case you miss it:

To Sandy: One, I'm not the TSFC, I _volunteer_ for them. Two, you erased my work within 100 seconds of me posting it before I could even establish rationale, etc. (And that goes for you too, After Midnight -- don't either of you have lives? With you, Sandy, I suspect a disorder is informing your decisions. And the TSFC/TSA rivalry myth is sick - stop acting like such a war-drumming American) Why don't next time you take a deep breath, wait a few minutes, and see what the editor finishes with. And not caring about wasting NPO money, After Midnight? What's wrong with you? Are you listening to yourself? The power trip thing is so, so ugly, again going for both of you. - Mt Valley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt Valley (talk • contribs) 05:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm. Goodness, Mt Valley, you're off to such a fine start after the help I gave you on establishing Tourette Syndrome Foundation of Canada. I've never erased your work; I did help you establish notability months ago. I removed a three or four words of WP:PEACOCKery so that, as discussed with After Midnight (talk · contribs), the justified COI tag could be removed from the article to the talk page.[1] I hope you've had a chance to read Wiki policies including conflict of interest, verifiability, notability, be civil and particularly, no personal attacks. Volunteer or not, the TSFC is editing their own article, and I've offered to help, explaining to After Midnight (after he justifiably placed a COI tag on the article, probably because you're uploading images improperly) that there had not been a problem so far. Of note, although I've helped you establish that article since the day you first edited, you have just lodged a blockable personal attack against me. I can't find After Midnight's comment about NPO money, so I don't know what that's about. TSA/TSFC rivalry; I have no idea what you're talking about, but I can say that the Tourette Syndrome Association isn't editing their entry. Ta! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy, you initially attempted to remove the article, I would hardly consider that help. You did eventually acknowledge a need for notability, but that's not exactly insight: it's Wiki policy. My observations were were based on repeated comments (which After Midnight appears to have been erased) about you "keeping people in line" and others that are clear indicators, as with After Midnight, of a need for authority/power, however minor it may be. You stated that you had sources/connections where others did not. Again, your language demonstrated a lording over, a superior position, one of mockery and braggery. I apologize for my reaction and appreciate your recent edit. However, when established editors have these kinds of attitudes and jump on other, less experienced editors while they are in the middle of editing says a great deal about the climate here. User:Mt Valley —Preceding comment was added at 22:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that isn't correct, Mt Valley; I have never attempted to remove the article. I asked you to establish notability a year and a half ago, and even though the article's notability is still marginal at best, I helped push that along and never prodded or AFD'd the article (that is what it takes to remove an article from Wiki). Click on the History tab from the article, and you can see that I have never come close to "attempting to remove the article". I'm not aware of any comments erased by After Midnight, but since I'm not him/her and had never crossed paths with him/her, whatever s/he said or did doesn't involve me. Where have I stated that I have sources others do not? I stated I would try to establish the article's notability myself. I have now done that. I have gone through every source I have, and have found that Kushner's book devotes a couple of sentences to the TSFC; I can find nothing else, nor can I find anything else on a news search that isn't from the TSFC. I'm afraid I can't acknowledge having demonstrated any of the attitude you claim, because the *only* thing I have done with this article is to let Wiki notability and COI policies slide in your favor, as I personally recognize the importance of the TSFC. As I acknowledged to After Midnight, establishing notability for the TSFC is harder than for the TSA, because the press usually mentions the TSA. I hope you are able to reread the messages you seem to have misunderstood, and will come to see that I have only tried to help the article in your favor. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Eugene Melnyk article inquiry

Hi there, Regarding your inquiry about the statement "a benefactor of Tourette Syndrome Foundation of Canada" I've narrowed it down. Firstly by year, and then between months, and then narrowed it down further to find out who exactly added that. It appears to me- to be (user) "Handicapper". Dated "Revision 23:56, 31 August 2006". It came right after the edit by (user) "Kevlar67". It then looks to me as thougj it was further edited by (user) "SandyGeorgia" "Revision as of 21:40, 9 December 2006" You might want to check with both of these people what the dispute was between those dates. *If* they can recall back to 2006.

P.S. See the history of that article here. CaribDigita (talk) 20:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I inserted a few relative links. Handicapper (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TSFC Logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TSFC Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]