User talk:NFLthomas2012

City University of Seattle

Please discuss your reasoning in talk:City University of Seattle before removing again. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 20:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You replaced sourced content in City University of Seattle with unsourced content. Please see wp:rs and wp:citing sources. Please discuss in talk before restoring. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not express your point of view in Wikipedia articles, as you did to City University of Seattle. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the balanced tone expected in an encyclopedia. I am aware of the situation, and I am much better situated to deal with it than you . if you have problems with the material there, please discuss them on the talk page. We will not permit unfounded or exaggerated accusations; we will equally prevent white-washing. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

City University of Seattle

I wanted to respond to your edit comment you added at the article: You wrote, "The references are not in english and are questionable. The Slovak campus was rated as the top business school in Slovakia. It did not go bankrupt and the Swiss partner had the legal issues." Note please, that I am not siding for or against your position. I do take issue, however, with your reasoning. For one, English sources are not required, and although non-English sources are less convenient, we don't automatically presume they are not reliable (see: WP:NONENG). You also make the claim that those sources are "questionable". I was wondering if you could explain a bit more what leads you to that conclusion. Are they from publishers with poor reputations, for example? Lastly, you assert that the university did not go bankrupt and the Swiss partner had the legal issues... do you have a published, independent, reliable source for that view? I'm asking, again not to attack your view, but to try and show you the standard of argument that is required to engage at an article, especially a controversial one. If I can assist you with your research of presenting your views more effectively, please feel free to contact me on my talk page any time. Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 23:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Certified Patent Valuation Analyst (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Certified Patent Valuation Analyst.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 21:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NFLthomas2012, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Certified Patent Valuation Analyst concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Certified Patent Valuation Analyst, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:City University of Seattle Urban Campus.jpg

The file File:City University of Seattle Urban Campus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]