User talk:Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr

Welcome!

Hi Caphtaain! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP: ANYBIO, Wikipedia is not a reliable or acceptable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shuuranattha "Caphtaain" Ashvajayajita! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita (April 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a place for articles about yourself. You can have this on your user page, but not as an article.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita

Hello, Shuuranattha "Caphtaain" Ashvajayajita. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Shuuranattha (Caphtaain) Ashvajayajita, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, as requested I went back and added the attribution. Thanks. Shuuranattha "Caphtaain" Ashvajayajita (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt action. I have some comments regarding the article which I'll leave on its talk page. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhothai consonants

Hello, thank you for adding the consonants to the article. I was thinking that changing the table to look like the table at this website, so adding the sound value and the modern Thai letter, would be perfect. Are you interested in doing that? Glennznl (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't planned on doing it right now but I might be doing it later, due to the headache of researching and citing original sounds which correspond to the glyphs, I also plan on adding the vowels and example texts, but it's 3.17 am right now and I have a doctor's appointment tommorrow. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr: That sounds great. Thanks for the reply and the work, no need to rush. --Glennznl (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it appears that you forgot the numeral ๓/3. Thanks in advance. :) --Glennznl (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing, according to the source on the page, the script has 39 consonants, and right now we have 40 on display. ฮ seems to be the "excess" letter, and the website I linked to you earlier says that it is one of the modern Thai letters for which there is no Sukhothai equivalent. Did you base the Sukhothai ฮ from a source, and is that other page wrong? --Glennznl (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC) --Glennznl (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the thing about ฮ is that there are conflicting , though more tend to say that ฮ did not exist, since I do not have anything to back this up, I will remove ฮ. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also, I need an opinion on the approximation of the original sounds, I referenced the history section from the thai language, and thai script pages. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 12:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks accurate enough to me but I don't have enough knowledge about the historical phonology of Thai to have an opinion. I looked in the sources used for the article, but none provide the old pronunciation from the time the script was made. --Glennznl (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blog spamming

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Sukhothai script. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 10:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Paul_012 (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please make sure your image additions comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]