User talk:NinjaCheetos

My Pet Peeve

@NinjaCheetos: Done I found the source of your concern. Yes, there was a script I wrote that did not have my signature. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers. Historiador (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC) tes|date=August 2016}} {{Infobox video game |title = Minecraft |image =Minecraft logo.svg |caption = |developer = Mojang |publisher = {{plainlist|[reply]

Mojang (PC, mobile, Wii U)
Microsoft Studios (X360, XONE, Windows Phone, Windows 10 Edition)
Sony Computer Entertainment <smal

Welcome!

Hello, NinjaCheetos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 108.20.58.194 (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution. Please, go back and rewrite your entry paying close attention to the way you include the info. It is appearing incorrectly in the article.

December 2015

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mojang— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PBS Kids. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

[[file:DownloadUse this fileUse this fileEmail a linkInformation File:LEGO Minecraft Wither (15900983217).jpg Size of this preview: 735 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 294 × 240 pixels | 588 × 480 pixels | 941 × 768 pixels | 1,255 × 1,024 pixels | 2,808 × 2,291 pixels. Add a note Help about image annotations

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: PBS Kids was changed by NinjaCheetos (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962593 on 2015-12-01T18:12:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NinjaCheetos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was tryng to do good sTuff but people were messing with. my edits and saying ot was vandalizizm NinjaCheetos (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're saying this was "good stuff"? Max Semenik (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NinjaCheetos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im rlly sorry but i have lots of good edits

Decline reason:

I just looked at all of your edits; apart from those in your userspace there are only twenty, so it did not take long. I see several one-word additions, but I do not see lots of good edits; or any, really. I see on your userpage that you claim significant editing skill and experience. You can claim it, but that does not make it so. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: After looking at the user page I had a notion of indefinitely blocking the user for their own good. I won't object if the block length is modified either way. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neil, I did see your comment. I have not modified the block, but will watch the page and will re-impose a block if disruption continues. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why does everyone want to pick on me i rlly dont get this all i try to do is help and people start insultng me and being rlly mean and saying that i suck :(

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how do i do "good edits" amd why do i get blocked — Preceding unsigned comment added by NinjaCheetos (talk • contribs)

NinjaCheetos, editing Wikipedia successfully requires follow a lot of rules and requires a lot of reading. It's clear from the way you write and edit that you are perhaps a young editor. I would suggest you attempt to read some of our policies, but please understand that it takes a certain maturity (not necessarily age, but maturity) to edit Wikipedia without being disruptive. You've been blocked for one week so I suggest you use that time to become familiar with our policies. Repeated unblock requests or trying to draw the attention of administrators to your userpage may result in a longer block under WP:IDHT. Mkdw ^talk 00:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Valery Fadeyev page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm CyanoTex. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to League of Legends— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CyanoTex (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Minecraft. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pokémon Go, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Minecraft. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 20:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Markus Persson. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]