Jump to content

User talk:Novellasyes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Novellasyes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sadads (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Éliphas Lévi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Kindly Ones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl Leopold von Möller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Darke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beachcomber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Dear Novellasyes, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially helping to uphold WP:NPOV at the article about People of Praise. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 02:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

I saw that you opened a number of talk page discussions about recent changes at People of Praise. As I just explained on talk there, I went ahead and reverted to an earlier, stable version of the page because I think there were enough substantive issues with the recently introduced content to warrant reverting it. It was probably a bit inelegant, but this way we can figure out which changes have consensus before re-adding. Marquardtika (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's interesting and gives me an opportunity to read about policies like WP:SYNTH that are new to me. Novellasyes (talk) 14:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

[edit]

Re. the discussion you opened at Talk:People of Praise#Coral Thiell (Part 2), you might consider making it a formal RFC. If you do that, then for each option outlined, I think you should put the actual text that is being proposed. I think after discussion plays out a bit, the options with the most traction will be clear, and then maybe there can be an RFC with the top two options, or something like that. I can help you set it up if you want. Also, some unsolicited advice. I think you have a lot of interesting things to say, but I think your comments will be better received if you stick to Wikipedia policy rather than personal commentary or anecdotes. Template:Wikipedia policies and guidelines is a good place to start. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:No original research as well. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Marquardtika (talk) 03:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marquardtika. Thank you! I appreciate the guidance. I will work on creating some proposed actual text for the options in a sandbox and let you know when it is ready to look at. Novellasyes (talk) 00:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Marquardtika. I've read this page: Wikipedia:Requests for comment including Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Request comment on articles, policies, or other non-user issues. I've started this sandbox to try to follow the directions there: User:Novellasyes/sandbox/Coral Thiell RFC. So far, the sandbox is my attempt to offer a neutral statement about what the dispute is about. Does that look about right? And if it does, I think the next step is to create some actual text that would be proposed for the competing options. If you think that the statement I wrote about what the controversy is about ( User:Novellasyes/sandbox/Coral Thiell RFC ) needs work, please feel free to edit it directly. Novellasyes (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re Theill RfC

[edit]

Inasmuch as she's known not only for being a member of PoP but for her memoir, arguably this is enough to render her notable for wiki's purposes. Sure wheras a memoirist such as Susan Ray Schmidt has a few hundred Amazon reviewers and Theill, only a dozen. However, Theill's memoir combined with her appearances taped for broadcast in news segments, ought tgthr be enough for her to pass the wp:N hurdle, inMHO.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and I tend to agree. Also, thanks for your steadfast work on the pages over the last couple of weeks. Novellasyes (talk) 22:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hodgdon's secret garden...would you mind copying-and-pasting your comment above over here: Talk:People of Praise#Survey? Then other people who are sifting-and-winnowing their thoughts on this will get your perspective. I would do that myself (the copy-and-paste) but I don't think we're supposed to do things like that with people's talk page edits. Novellasyes (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
THANK YOU for the RfC, and for your perseverance in getting this right. It doesn't upset me that no one agrees with my viewpoint, but the RfC lets all the folks weigh in and come to an actual consensus. 17:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Last1in (talkcontribs)
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nancy Jacobson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexius of Rome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monastery of the Dormition of the Theotokos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited When Things of the Spirit Come First, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pantheon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medium (website), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evan Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heath Freeman

[edit]

Thank you so much for your help on Heath Freeman! I am considering putting the article into mainspace. I think once it is there, there will be a sudden wave of fresh material added by interested editors. What do you think? Best, Thriley (talk) 03:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thriley. Thanks! I hope people dig into editing it. I feel like all I really did was put in the background bio material (that I could find in RS). Novellasyes (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change article titles by making cut & paste moves. Follow the instructions at WP:Moving a page. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wbm1058. I really screwed that up and I'm so sorry. Is there something I can or should do to fix that? Novellasyes (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator privileges are needed to fix it, by doing a WP:history merge. I did that for you. It's good now. – wbm1058 (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wbm1058, thank you and again my apologies for causing more work for an admin. Novellasyes (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Schools

[edit]

I would appreciate your feedback in the conversation here, if you get the chance.[1] I trust your judgment, and have found your comments very useful.Marshal277 (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Sampol327 has an SPI

[edit]

See Talk:Bradley Tusk and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mbc16. Mako001 (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mountain Lake, Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pink-slime journalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible coi

[edit]

Hi Novellasyes! A few days ago I found this discussion that you started regarding possible SPAs back in 2021. The activity from one of the accounts mentioned there has continued into 2023. I would like to know if you think that there is a possible conflict of interest. It's so unusual that this account is basically doing nothing but writing positive things about one individual and topics that they are linked to. Would you agree? The Glam Rock Joseph Stalin (talk) 04:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems extremely likely to me that there is a conflict of interest. Novellasyes (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So sorry for taking so long to respond. I agree with you. I also believe there is a conflict of interest here. I am unsure what to do about it however I could begin compiling some evidence that I suppose we could present to the noticeboard. But I'm sure you're already well ahead of me on that one. Enjoy your weekend! The Glam Rock Joseph Stalin (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the first thing to do is to ask any potentially implicated users directly on their talk page(s). Novellasyes (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BlackRock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Novellasyes! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:53, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Center for Public Integrity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward R. Murrow Award.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Novellasyes for collecting more than 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charitable activities of the Knights of Columbus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Kelly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Morning America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
31 flavors!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Despite how I disagree with your latest reply, I really love the way you talk and structure your points. In addition to your comfortable train of thought laid out, I'm sure I will have absorbed 31 new idioms by the end of the month a la trips to Baskin-Robbins. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]