User talk:Oma-Clare

May 2023

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Elizabeth Fry have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Donald Albury 15:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Donald,

She visited them every time there was a deportation because the deportees were totally traumatised by being taken in uncovered carts and being made a public spectacle with all manner of things thrown at them. Elizabeth Fry appealed the the authorities to provide covered carts and got them. The day and night before deportation before she got started, there was collective terror. As well as getting death penalties commuted to deportation, and sorting the open carts, she actually went with them. This was a fundamental part of her work. I too was astonished to find it. I am giving a talk about her next week as it is her birthday on 21 May. Oma-Clare (talk) 02:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide citations to one or more reliable sources that support that content in order to add it to the article. Donald Albury 17:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any mention of Elizabeth Fry visiting transportation ships in the source that you provided for your edit on that topic, and have marked it as {{Failed verification}}. Any time you are citing a longer work, please provide page number(s), if available, or when there are no page numbers, as in an e-book, a chapter or section heading or other means of narrowing down the location of the content you are citing as a source. I have formatted the source you gave for the content you added to the Prison reform and prisoner reformation section. Please take a look at the guideline Wikipedia:Citing sources. While you are not expected to get all the details of citation formatting down pat (there are plenty of gnomes who deal with that kind of stuff), the more information you can provide about a source, the easier it is for the rest of us to follow up on your work. - Donald Albury 18:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Oma-Clare, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Britain Yearly Meeting. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Erp (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your items in Britain Yearly Meeting as they were to a field in the infobox that doesn't exist and a link that went nowhere. Erp (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clare Dimyon

I've revereted your latest changes because it looks like you're just putting up random facts with absolutely no context on what they mean or why they're important. Also, it's great that you're trying to provide sources, please make sure that they are actually reliable sources and not blogs, or random webpages. Thanks. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, do you have some personal connection to Clare Dimyon? Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's quite obvious that you are the same person. Therefore, you need to stop editing the article. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Oma-Clare. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Clare Dimyon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Axad12 (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friend, I have been participating on Wikipedia in good faith and trying to correct the falsifications made on a page about ME by an individual Jauerback who is deliberately falsifying my life story with a very nasty homophobic slur. Have you got any advice to give me about that? This would seem to me to be deliberate harassment not any kind of collaboration. I am participating in good faith but Jauerback is making false statements about my life story and I am simply trying to return it. 5.67.185.62 (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see the user you mention has only removed material from the article and returned it to the text as it was prior to edits you made to the article yourself (in breach of the conflict of interest guidelines, here WP:COI). I would advise you to start a thread at the article talk page, stating your conflict of interest, and detailing the elements of the article which should be removed/altered. Axad12 (talk) 17:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Axad12. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Axad12 (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it civil to place homophobic slurs on a wiki page about me?

Had you considered the duress of homophobia on a rape survivor and by now it is clearly deliberate duress designed to distress me.

Have you taken any account of the fact I am autistic? 5.67.185.62 (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per my comment in the thread directly above, I would advise you to take your content-based concerns to the article talk page. That will be the most effective way to get non-conflicted editors to consider altering the article text. Axad12 (talk) 17:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An IP address should not be replying here. If that's you Clare, please log in.

You really need to propose your changes on the article talk page and identify what, exactly, is the slur you object to. All that happened is someone reverted your changes back to what it was before. Nobody is causing deliberate duress, they are just trying to make sure the article complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If there is a violation of WP:BLP in the article (that is, an unsourced assertion about a living person) then that needs to be removed. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - don't get blocked

If you make another substantive change to an article with which you have a conflict of interest, I'm going to have to block you from editing. I know you're acting in good faith, but your actions have been disruptive.

In articles where you have a conflict of interest, there are some things you can do: you may make minor corrections to spelling, grammar, names, dates, and numbers. You may revert obvious vandalism (that's actual vandalism, not just prose you object to that cites reliable sources). You may add additional citations to sources that are independent of you (not things that you authored).

Anything else, propose on the article talk page. You may use Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard to guide you through making a good proposal. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: - I decided to issue a WP:PBLOCK not having seen this. Oma-Clare, this means you cannot edit the article which you are the subject of. The talk page remains open to you. If there are contined breaches of the WP:BLP policy, I am happy to consider semi-protection of the article in the first place, with extended-confirmed protection a further option should it prove necessary. Mjroots (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with a partial block. That is the best option. Oma-Clare can still edit any of the other 6 million articles on Wikipedia, as well as the talk page of the article about her. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oma-Clare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

telling the truth about myself with references. Someone-else who is not me has invented the idea that I am "queer". I am not nor have I ever been "queer" and it is for me as applied to me a homophobic insult of the highest order. I am being blocked for telling the Truth about myself. Homophobia is neither friendly nor collaborative. If I am upset about this homophobic slur being applied to my name, then that is rational. Oma-Clare (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see nothing in the Clare Dimyon article that refers to you as "queer". You are not blocked from making constructive suggestions at Talk:Clare Dimyon. That is what the talk page is for, and you have never used it, not even one single time. As you have been reminded previously, proposing changes on an article talk page is how anyone with a conflict of interest should conduct themselves. You may use Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard to guide you through the process of proposing changes. The same goes for Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp, with which you also seem to have a conflict of interest. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please assume good faith when referring to other Wikipedia editors. Whoever added the article about you to Category:British LGBTQ rights activists did not do so with the intention of making a "homophobic slur" towards you. (You may read about the decision to add "Q" to the category name here.) Nor does adding you to that category necessarily imply that you are, or idientfy as, "Queer". The title "LGBTQ" is clearly an inclusive set, since just as not everyone in it identifies as "Q", nor do they all identify as "L", as "B" or as "T". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]