User talk:OwenBlacker/Archive 19
This is an archive of past discussions with User:OwenBlacker, for the period January – December 2023. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 |
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
DYK nomination of London Partnership Register
Hello! Your submission of London Partnership Register at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hameltion (talk, contribs) 17:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Done OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 07:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for London Partnership Register
On 25 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article London Partnership Register, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, before same-sex unions were legally recognised in the UK, the London Partnership Register allowed nearly 1,000 couples to celebrate their relationships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/London Partnership Register. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, London Partnership Register), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Wiki-project Prussia
Hey there OwenBlacker,
I recently saw that you're a member of the inactive project Prussia, I also joined a few days ago, and today submitted a draft article about Landkreis Heilsberg. Anyway I wanted to ask you if you would be interested in reviving the project and recruiting and memebers Crainsaw (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Crainsaw: Sorry for the delayed response. I'm afraid I devote a lot of time to the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group now and I don't really have the capacity to be very helpful here. Sorry — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- its alright i was just asking to see if any existing member still wanted to help Crainsaw (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
CSS help
Thanks so much for the suggestion about fonts and the offer to help. Honestly I have no idea where I'd start other than (presumably) creating User:Guettarda/common.css Guettarda (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey Guettarda, I've been writing up a how-to at m:User:OwenBlacker/Customising your fonts on Meta. D'you wanna take a look and give me some constructive criticism on the content?
- I'm very conscious I might have made it way too overcomplicated 😅 — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 18:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Australia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Scientific racism on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Pings
I saw your signature. I think you might want to consider the option to "Automatically subscribe to topics" in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you. That's super obvious and I don't know why it didn't occur to me to look for that setting. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's a pretty new feature. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
Good article reassessment for Bugchasing
Bugchasing has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Isthistwisted (talk) 02:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
You don't seem to have this notification on your Talk page
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Sweet6970 (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:United States Space Force on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 20:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
I dunno if you got the ping
Hey. I dunno if you got the ping, would you or someone else from the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group be able to chime in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies#Lia Thomas on Wikidata? Hopefully you, given your familiarity with Wikidata's policies and guidelines. There's some issues at that discussion which I think the user group would be well suited to handling, especially in line with goals 5 and 7 of the user group. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, sorry, I had seen the ping and was ADHDing about replying to it; I just replied there now (indeed before seeing this ping 😅). Thank you for pinging me on it, @Sideswipe9th; please do ping me for other conversations if you want to make sure I see them — one of the things I find frustrating on here is how difficult it can be to keep track of conversations going on in different places. Thanks again! — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 16:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! I totally get you on the ADHD thing, keeping track of all the conversations you might be involved in is a nightmare when you have the working memory of a goldfish! Meds help a little, but working memory is still shot. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
Hi OwenBlacker! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 10:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Jonathan A Jones, thanks for the heads-up. Which edit are you referring to? I make a lot of minor edits and occasionally mark some more substantive edits as minor by accident. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 10:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was the edit to Simon Edge which I first saw [1]. Whether the language tagging edits count as minor is debatable, but that one certainly wasn't - though definitely a good edit. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'd disagree; I would consider that minor — sure, I added an infobox, which might be debatable, but language tagging, formatting and linking in refs certainly all are. There's no change to the substantive content; it's all GNOME-work. Guess we might need to agree to disagree — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 13:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was the edit to Simon Edge which I first saw [1]. Whether the language tagging edits count as minor is debatable, but that one certainly wasn't - though definitely a good edit. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
August 2023 - Transgender rights in the United Kingdom
It looks like [2] you are accusing me of being disruptive. This looks like a personal attack to me. Disagreement is not disruption. Would you care to clarify your comment? Sweet6970 (talk) 14:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've corrected the wording to more accurately reflect what I was trying to say — "could be considered to be disruptive" rather than "would be disruptive". But I wasn't accusing you of anything, much less making a personal attack. Perhaps we both need to remember to be better at assuming good faith. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 15:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shivaji on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 19:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
ITN recognition for Molly Holzschlag
On 7 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Molly Holzschlag, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 17:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Building Safety Act
Hi, I do work in the industry and am positive about what I wrote. I will try and edit some pages to bring I some clarity on the changes. Pignoof (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't meant to imply that you might not, sorry 🙂
- More of an update to talk about the changes the Building Safety Act make and the ways in which things have started diverging between England and Wales would be awesome. But I only made the edit because I had literally just been reading something while trying to buy a flat 😅
- — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 19:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
Organizer Tools Office Hours & Event Discovery Project
(Lire ce message en français); (Ver este mensaje en español); (Angalia ujumbe huu kwa Kiswahili); (إقرأ هذه الرسالة بالعربي) Please help translate to other languages. .
The Campaigns team at the Wikimedia Foundation has some updates to share with you, which are:
We invite you to attend our upcoming community office hours to learn about organizer tools, including the Event registration tool (which has new and upcoming features). The office hours are on the following dates, and you can join one or both of them:
- Saturday, October 7 at 12:00 UTC (Register here)
- Languages available: Arabic, English, French, Swahili
- Tuesday, October 10 at 18:00 UTC (Register here).
- Languages available: Arabic, English, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Swahili
We have launched a new project: Event Discovery. This project aims to make it easier for editors to learn about campaign events. We need your help to understand how you would like to discover events on the wikis, so that we can create a useful solution. Please share your feedback on our project talk page.
- Thank you, and we hope to see you at the upcoming office hours!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you subscribed to this list
Edits to Baroness Joanna Shields page
My name is Laura and I work for Joanna Shields, Baroness Shields, a baron, businessperson, and former British politician. The page about her was recently tagged for COI and advert issues due to some poor edits made years ago. I posted here regarding my desire to address the substance of the tags with a re-write or heavy trims, to remove the promotional content. I was hoping you might be willing to chime in on the proposed trims and/or the suggestion for a rewrite. Let me know. Best regards.<span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> LauTad89 (talk) 07:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamas on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
Nomination of Direct care for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct care until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Elshad (talk) 11:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
Arguments
I just wanted to quickly let you know that I am very impressed by your ability to make arguments. I've only been on this site for half a year and am already seeing my skill improve, however bad it may be. I can't wait to get onto your level. —Panamitsu (talk) 11:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Sam Altman
Thanks for the new references. I see there's a larger problem than just the dispute at Sam Altman. I've never given WP:CT/GG disputes much attention. Is there somewhere to request help at this point, or are you waiting until there's a clear WP:AE or WP:AN/WP:ANI case? - Hipal (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for messaging; I've been repairing some of the damage (and improving those articles further a little) during the BoT call just now and I've added a {{Uw-vandalism3}} warning to the user's talk page earlier. Hopefully that should stop things, but I want to make sure the user has had a clear and specific warning before looking at AE or ANI. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 20:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have boldly edited pages where in my view references to someone's sexuality is irrelevant. To be accused of vandalism for this is not acceptable. As a gay man who has worked in technology for 32 years, I have a view about this, as my bold editing has been. Wikipedia is not censored. Juddlackland (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Juddlackland: As I have just pointed out on your own Talk: page, it is vandalism to be removing relevant information without consensus. Of the people's biographies you have removed their sexuality from, several are people for who their sexuality is a key part of their work.
- I too am a gay man who has been working in technology (for nearly 30 years in my case). Our personal views are not the key point here, rather the consensus on biographies. Censoring people's sexuality out of their articles is vandalism, not "boldness". You need to stop doing that. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 22:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have boldly edited pages where in my view references to someone's sexuality is irrelevant. To be accused of vandalism for this is not acceptable. As a gay man who has worked in technology for 32 years, I have a view about this, as my bold editing has been. Wikipedia is not censored. Juddlackland (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done. Hells no. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 22:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Accusation of vandalism
I have boldly edited pages where in my view the references to someone's sexuality in my view were unnecessary. It is not vandalism and to accuse me of it is not in the spirit of Wikipedia. Juddlackland (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- (I have answered this above and on your talk: page; we dont' need to discuss this in 3 places.) — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 22:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there - I noticed you mentioned in the references to improve the above article. I've been doing some work on the article at the moment and opened it up to peer review - would be very interested to hear your thoughts on the article at the moment and any possibilities for improvement. Thank you! GnocchiFan (talk) 14:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just as an update, this has now been moved to Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire and I've nominated it for GA status; let me know if you still think there are improvements to be made to the article or any further comments. Thanks! GnocchiFan (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamas on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest