User talk:Patar knight
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
[edit]- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Your edit to the short description for Treblinka
[edit]I saw that you just changed the short description for the Treblinka extermination camp page, removing the important word "extermination." https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Treblinka_extermination_camp&diff=next&oldid=1234465441 I have no problem with you adding "Nazi" or changing "near Treblinka, Poland" to "in Poland" but the word "extermination" is significant enough that it should be both in the page title and the short description. Yes, it appears to be redundant to have the word "extermination" in both the title and description, but the word "camp" has too many meanings to be left alone. The word "extermination" is necessary for disambiguation for the word Treblinka, as it is used here: Treblinka (disambiguation) AndyBloch (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- "Extermination" is already in the title, so it is unnecessary to have in the short description per WP:SDDUPLICATE. If you think that readers will be so confused by what type of camp Treblinka is after seeing the title "Treblinka extermination camp" and the short description "Nazi German camp in Poland in World War II" that "extermination" has to be used twice, then perhaps you should start a page move request on the talk page to discuss a clearer name for the article. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is that the word "extermination" needs to be repeated for context, just like the word "camp" is repeated. Furthermore, leaving out the word "extermination" seems judgmental, suggesting that Treblinka was just a camp, not an extermination camp. (Holocaust deniers and minimizers thrive on wording like this.)
- Here's an example where a word from the title is repeated in the short description: Hitler Youth has the short description "Youth organisation of the Nazi Party." You wouldn't want to remove the word "Youth" because the word "organisation" is too generic. The word "camp" is likewise too generic to remove the first word of the compound noun. AndyBloch (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- "Camp" is repeated because it is basically necessary, since the alternatives are longer and/or more ambiguous (e.g. "facility", "building", "complex"). This is similar to how "war" is repeated in the SDs of many articles that already have that in the title. I have not removed "extermination" from the title, so trying to say that this change somehow helps Holocaust deniers is ridiculous. The article title very clearly describes Treblinka as an extermination camp, and if you feel that does not provide enough context for what Treblinka is, then you should propose a new article title.
- The Hitler Youth SD is less than 40 characters, so having duplicate words is less of an issue in terms of WP:SDLENGTH. Secondly, there is some value in including "youth" because the "Youth" in the title is part of a proper noun and there is the possibility of confusion with other organization types (e.g. juvenile sports clubs, see Category:UEFA Youth League teams). It's useful to clarify that it is a general youth organization and not something more specific. This is not the case for the Treblinka article, since "extermination" is not a proper noun and the other entries at the DAB page are not plausibly connected with extermination. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Have you ever edited Treblinka extermination camp in the past? I am asking you as someone who has edited the page and studied Treblinka and other Nazi extermination camps, concentration camps, internment camps, transit camps, forced-labor camps, etc., that you please put the word "extermination" back in the description. (I would do it myself but I do not have 500 edits and the page protection has changed.)
- (You should think twice before calling an argument "ridiculous" that you haven't studied. Read enough of the arguments that Holocaust deniers make and you will learn that their arguments and dog whistles often stem from even smaller minutiae.)
- Here are some short descriptions for other Nazi concentration camp articles. I have found zero short descriptions which include "camp" alone, without being part of a compound noun.
- Dachau concentration camp Nazi concentration camp in Germany before and during World War II
- Drancy internment camp Internment camp for Jews in occupied France during World War II
- Auschwitz concentration camp German network of concentration and extermination camps in occupied Poland during World War II
- Bergen-Belsen concentration camp Nazi concentration camp
- Belzec extermination camp Nazi German death camp in occupied Poland
- Chełmno extermination camp German extermination camp in Poland during World War II
- Sobibor extermination camp Nazi extermination camp in Poland
- Majdanek concentration camp Nazi concentration camp
- Westerbork transit camp Nazi transit camp for Jews in the occupied Netherlands
- For comparison with other topics, here are baseball team pages that include the city in both the title and short description. I don't think you should start removing the city from them without discussing it first with other editors.
- Philadelphia Phillies Major League Baseball franchise in Philadelphia
- New York Yankees and New York Mets Major League Baseball franchise in New York City
- Los Angeles Dodgers Major League Baseball franchise in Los Angeles, California
- Please add "extermination" back to the description. AndyBloch (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have not previously edited the page, but please see WP:OWN. I have edited plenty of articles related to the Holocaust and I took an IRL course on Nazi Germany in college, so you should stop baselessly accusing me of not having studied the topic.
- You are accusing me of unknowingly abetting Holocaust denialism by using "camp" instead of "extermination camp" in the short description. The article itself frequently uses "camp" instead of "extermination camp" to describe Treblinka. Were the editors who did that abetting Holocaust denialism? Were you turning a blind eye to Holocaust denialism by not changing this before the article's protection level was changed? No, because that's a ridiculous argument.
- The variance in short descriptions for Nazi concentration camps, lack of talk page discussions, and some clear violations of WP:SDLENGTH, show that there clearly isn't an agreed upon short description format for the area. One of the goals for short descriptions is disambiguation (WP:SDPURPOSE), so dates and location are frequently encouraged. Here, since there is a duplicate word, such helpful extra information could be inserted in its place.
- I fail to see the relevance of the sports examples. Repeating geographic information for sports teams in the SD is often helpful because teams might not be based in where they are named (e.g. the New York Jets play in New Jersey, despite still being in the greater NYC metro area) and the location itself may be ambiguous (e.g. Los Angeles, California vs. Los Angeles County, New York State vs. New York City). Here, there's no real concern about what "extermination camp" means. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Where did I claim any sort of ownership of the page? Where did I accuse you of not having studied the general topic? My point is that you did not edit this particular page before. I am simply asking that you give some deference to me as a prior editor of the page when I say that the word "extermination" is important as part of the compound noun. One word. That's it. Instead of taking my argument seriously you literally called part of it "ridiculous." It's frankly very off-putting to people like me that periodically try to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith only to have prolific editors belittle their arguments .
- Informing someone that an edit could be unknowingly abetting something is not an accusation of wrongdoing. It was meant to help you understand the full effect of your edit. Nevertheless, there's a conspiracy theory about Treblinka specifically that it was just a transit camp or labor camp. Here are some posts on X for example: https://x.com/azgh54kk9/status/1797284730142118338 https://x.com/vax_dodger/status/1801224924951912675 https://x.com/MEMRIReports/status/1617451885832835074 https://x.com/K31k3sR31ch3n/status/1809973139025088552
- Comparing usage of a word in the short description to its use in the body of the article is a straw man argument. Of course in the article a shorthand will be used when it's clear, just like pronouns are used. Similarly, the article frequently uses "Treblinka" instead of "the Treblinka extermination camp."
- There may be excessive variance in the short descriptions of Nazi concentration and other camps, but none of them (except for your edits) used "camp" except as part of a compound noun.
- I could have used many other examples besides the sports teams. They are relevant because they show that redundant words are frequently left in, even ones much longer and less consequential and controversial than "extermination." Also, you took out "near Treblinka." Why should "near Treblinka" be removed but "Los Angeles" or "Philadelphia" remain for baseball teams? Note also that sports teams move, and the articles usually include information about the teams prior to the moves, so the the location isn't that significant.
- (There's only one MLB team that has a short description without the location, due to this edit in the last 2 months: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baltimore_Orioles&diff=prev&oldid=1226308840 I wouldn't be too surprised if some earlier editor had spent time making all of the MLB short descriptions consistent. I think that the locations could all be removed, but I'd also leave it up to baseball editors to make the decision, and not make the change to just one or two teams.) AndyBloch (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OWN does not mean literal ownership, but includes attitudes such as asking for deference because of factors such who has edited an article or not. You also literally said
"You should think twice before calling an argument "ridiculous" that you haven't studied"
above. - Your position is that seeing "Treblinka extermination camp - Nazi German camp in Poland in World War II" is unacceptably inviting of Holocaust denialism because it does not say "Treblinka extermination camp - Nazi German extermination camp in Poland in World War II". The issue is that "extermination" is already in the title, so it is redundant to have in the short description as well per WP:SDDUPLICATE, as the two will almost always appear together.
- I would see your point if the article was at Treblinka, Treblinka Camp, or Treblinka Extermination Camp in the counterfactual example where that is a proper name, since all those titles would be helped by a short description clarifying that it was an extermination camp in actuality and not just a random camp or called "Extermination Camp". But we are already calling Treblinka an "extermination camp" once in WP:WIKIVOICE. If only doing so once is such a terrible thing, then I would strongly encourage you to try and change the article title, because the article title appears by itself far frequently than shorts descriptions, which essentially never do so. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OWN does not mean literal ownership, but includes attitudes such as asking for deference because of factors such who has edited an article or not. You also literally said
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
Technical news
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:United States and state-sponsored terrorism on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Miscellaneous
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
[edit]Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dakota Access Pipeline protests on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Patar knight! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC) |  |
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox country on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
"Meme in human form" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Meme in human form has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 28 § Meme in human form until a consensus is reached. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk – edits) 18:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
- Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
- An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
- Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).
Miscellaneous
- If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.
You've got mail
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Antitransphobe (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello Patar knight,
I just noticed Special:Diff/1249951914/1250008896 and wondered if you had intentionally edited through full protection, which mostly applies to administrators as well and requires uncontroversial or clearly-backed-by-consensus changes.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely didn't realize. Would have posted on the talk page first if I had, though it seems the dispute was largely about WP:UNDUE issues with the lead, though admittedly topics related to what I added, and has now died though (and the full protection expired). I will make a post now just in case however. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, no worries, thanks! 🙂 And yeah, I agree that the dispute was about different content, so even if it had been intentional, it would have been far from using the tools to continue an edit war during page protection. It just looked strange enough to make me wonder. 😊 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- (Also, it wasn't reverted for 24 hours now, so I guess it was indeed uncontroversial and thus fine anyway. I just lacked an overview of the other editors' views.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, no worries, thanks! 🙂 And yeah, I agree that the dispute was about different content, so even if it had been intentional, it would have been far from using the tools to continue an edit war during page protection. It just looked strange enough to make me wonder. 😊 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of common misconceptions on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Second Bulgarian Empire on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
Technical news
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Arbitration
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
Miscellaneous
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome Patar knight! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Administrators on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hamas on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)