User talk:PeterBaba1289

October 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Baba, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MPD (Talk to me!) 12:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PeterBaba1289, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PeterBaba1289! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your warning in edit summary

You do not have the ability to block anyone. Do not tell people you will block them. -- GB fan 11:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will also add that there is a better chance of you getting blocked than Bkonrad. -- GB fan 11:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your recent editing history at Baba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sjö (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 The evil side was scabbed away, so that one...  is real. It is Hungarian. Why do you have to worry about edit war? Your chat box makes no conclusion about my vandalism on Baba. Bkonrad and GB fan are still alive. But Matthew Peter-Davis is blocked. Only one of them will handle it... Ah.. never mind. it was already handled.  PeterBaba1289 (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]