User talk:RJS001

Hello, RJS001, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 22:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome!

Hi RJS001! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uni3993 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yan'an Rectification Movement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Qiushi, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one using this as a platform to spread misinformation about the name of The Party. RJS001 (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Yan'an Rectification Movement, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 01:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure buddy, sure RJS001 (talk) 22:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i in fact do not have an interested in the alleged genocideRJS001 (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further discretionary sanction alerts regarding J. K. Rowling

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SandyGeorgia why did you send this message multiple times? And sorry you like to defend bigotry. Maybe you can get over that in time as you mature RJS001 (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the alerts; it is not multiple times, it is two different alerts. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to remove the personalization and characterization of me, that would be a good step at this point. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i don’t remove correct peronsalization of transphobes who defend each other. And yes, you did send it too separate times. If it were two alerts they’d say seperate thibgs insted of just one line in them. You send spam messages claiming it’s relevant. RJS001 (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J. K. Rowling July 2022

This edit adds unsourced POV to the lead of a highly viewed biography of a living person. The content of the article, and the lead, both enjoy very strong consensus based on a recent well-attended RFC, a recent Featured article review, and the article is subject to double disretionary sanctions. Please see WP:FAOWN, and gain consensus for edits. I see you have other talk page posts about disruptive editing; if this trend continues, you are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, i’d rather be banned than defend transphobia in the way you are. “how about this, just cause i say a few people are transphobic you ought to be too and imma defend it with saying there is a consensus” No such consensus seems to exist from reading the talk page besides the spam you have engaged in by reverting actual edits. RJS001 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:J. K. Rowling. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In what way did I? I was attacking the user’s transphobia. As was very clear in it. RJS001 (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your assumed, incorrectly, the most abhorrent possible motive for another editors actions. Please stop. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stop being a transphobe sympathizer and stop allowing them in the website. RJS001 (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022 ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]