User talk:Reader1987

Nigeri attacks/ITN

Just a heads up that the article is nominated at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Nigeria_attacks(Lihaas (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

I have nominated the March 2012 Gaza-Israel clashes article for a mention on ITN.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kandahar massacre

Hi Reader1987,

Few days ago you created an article about the events in Kandahar on 11 March 2012. Later this article was renamed by User:ThaddeusB without any discussions on the article's talk page. He replaced the term "massacre" with the term "shooting spree". At the moment there is a discussion and a straw poll on the article's talk page on a suggestion to rename Panjwai shooting spree back to Kandahar massacre. If you are still interested in this topic, you are very welcome, as a creator of this page, to express your opinion there. --Potorochin (talk) 07:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Sabha conflict

Thanks!--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 07:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 Deir ez-Zor bombing

The article 2012 Deir ez-Zor bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER This info might be better if merged to 2011–2012 Syrian uprising

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 conflict - please do some background research

Dear Reader1987, I appreciate that you may be attached to the articles that you create, but I would implore you to read, first, the 1994 Rwandan Genocide article, the First Congo War article, the Second Congo War article, the FARDC article, the Kivu Conflict article, and the National Congress for the Defence of the People article. Saying this conflict 'started' in 2012 misrepresents what has actually been happening since 1994. Please if you're attached to the article at least make it more *accurate* and *contextual* Buckshot06 (talk) 07:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better still, anything by Gérard Prunier... Buckshot06 (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how many hundred silly stubs I deal with that have not been edited for years, whose original editor is long gone? Better still, I'll quote some policies at you: WP:BRD and WP:BOLD!! Buckshot06 (talk) 21:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're crazy, no one forces you to do that--Reader1987 (talk) 08:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do it because it improves the encyclopedia. Instead of reading somebody's abstraction of three newspaper articles completely divorced from any context, if that paragraph is incorporated into a larger article, it adds to the picture presented there, and is supported and clarified by the overall picture presented there. This is exactly the point of the note above about the Syrian bombing article. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page indicates quite a history of creating WP: Recentism and WP:NOTNEWS stubs.

Please WIKINEWS for that or add some notability. Remember RS soruces doesnt mean notability automatically because they publish lots of news and all of it is not encyclopaedic.(Lihaas (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

2012 Armenian-Azeri border clashes

Take care of your edits because its not AGF to have deceptive summaries: unexplained removal AGAIN, mocking edit summaries that makes a coc-upitseld on the singular, untrue, unsourced, OR -- see the source, not vandalism when it as explained its not notable. That said these were good: [1], [2](Lihaas (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Battle of Sidon

Hi, I see you eliminated the redirect of Battle of Sidon. I had considered a CSD tag because it seemed a mere duplicate of a brief paragraph in Syrian civil war spillover in Lebanon but thought that the redirect was a better choice. Two questions: Why have the Battle of Sidon page? Is there a reliable source that refers to the "Battle of Sidon". Thanks. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note on my talk page. Of course I will not be hasty but I do, very much, want your thoughts on my questions before moving on. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK got your second note. Thanks again. I'll revisit it sometime in September or October. Capitalismojo (talk) 17:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A heads-up on Iraq

Thanks for the heads-up. :) EkoGraf (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Campaignbox Egypt 2013

A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Egypt 2013 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anbar campaign (Fall 2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of April 2012 Idlib bombings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article April 2012 Idlib bombings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2012 Idlib bombings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]