User talk:Renamed user 864c542a23313621/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Renamed user 864c542a23313621. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Conan the Conqueror (upcoming film)
A tag has been placed on Conan the Conqueror (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Great help
Hello the great Musa! nice to see you contributing and i hope you continue...Now, I have a work for you as we are working on some cricket articles tasks..It will be great help if you help us in completing following articles as its related to Pakistan..Here are the few:
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Gaddafi Stadium Link here
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the National Stadium Link here
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Iqbal Stadium Link here
and from UAE
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Dubai International Cricket Stadium
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Sharjah Cricket Stadium
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Sheikh Zayed Cricket Stadium
you can also create other missing ones from following templates Template:International cricket five-wicket hauls by ground Template:International cricket centuries by ground We will be much thankful on behalf on our Cricket Project team if you complete them within a week or more as you required..again nice to see you and hope you will continue improving the cricket-related articles especially of Pakistan as they really need your help. GreenCricketTALK 13:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- @GreenCricket: Okay, I'll try my best. And please tell me Five wickets haul of which format should be in these articles?--MusaTalk ☻ 13:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Musa Raza: Actually, you need to include all formats ...you can take help from other articles in template..Thanks GreenCricketTALK 14:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Rademann is a famous German television producer. He got a lot of German televions awards like Bambi, Telestar and so on. Grew3426 (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Grew3426: Prove it by adding references from good sources in the article.
Thank you.--MusaTalk ☻ 21:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
There are references in article:
German newspapers FAZ and Tagesspiegel should be good enough as good sources. Grew3426 (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- I just came across this on your talk page, and added some more sources to major German media outlets. Also, I added a source for one of the Bambi awards (Life's work 2015). I think notability is well established in this way; articles about this man's death are really all over the German media these days. Unless you have specific objections, I will remove the speedy deletion notice. Markus Pössel (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Getting late in my time zone; I'll remove it now. Markus Pössel (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Your tagging of George K. Miley
Hi, you tagged George K. Miley as having copyediting issues. Could you be more specific? It looks fine to me. If you haven't any specific complaints, I'll remove the tag. Markus Pössel (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Markus Pössel: I tagged it after seeing a layout error which is now removed. You can now remove the tag.
Thanks.--MusaTalk ☻ 22:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)- OK, cool - thanks! Will do! Markus Pössel (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jiading City
Hello Musa Raza. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Jiading City. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks..
pending changes reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katietalk 03:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mann Mayal (2016).jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Mann Mayal (2016).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:PSL invitation
Anjana LarkaSEND WIKILOVE💗 11:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Joined.--Musa Talk 04:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Sanam teri Kasam
Hello Musa,
The movie released a couple of days back. Isnt it unethical to completely reveal each and every plot detail in wiki? I had hence changed the plot summary. Hope this makes sense now.
Thanks, Sonali — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.129.67.81 (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- @150.129.67.81: If the content in the article is not violating Wikipedia's guidelines then you can't remove it.--MusaTalk ☻ 20:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
2016 Pakistan Super League squads
Hello! Just fetch data from team articles and create a page of 2016 Pakistan Super League squads GreenCricketTALK 17:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- @GreenCricket: Okay, I'm doing it.--Musa Talk 17:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Islamabad United in 2016
This is the right way check Islamabad United in 2016..do it with all matches to show details also..just fetch data from main article 2016 Pakistan Super League GreenCricketTALK 14:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Fatima Surayya Bajia
Thank you for providing a source regarding the death of Fatima Surayya Bajia. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hamid Hussain.jpeg
A tag has been placed on File:Hamid Hussain.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jolly Ω Janner 20:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Syed Hamid Hussain.jpeg
A tag has been placed on File:Syed Hamid Hussain.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jolly Ω Janner 20:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
List of Pakistan Super League cricketers
Hello! you may plse help in creating the missing articles of List of Pakistan Super League cricketers Cheers.. GreenCricketTALK 13:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Adam Saleh
Greetings. Thank you for your recent edit to the article about Adam Saleh. The original edit was assumed to be Vandalism due to similar edits that can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.143.237.185 No disrespect was intended, so please do make corrections if my reversions were made in error. Thank you most kindly. Curley Wolf (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Senti Aur Mental Poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Senti Aur Mental Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. When you created this, you over-wrote an existing page at Waiting (film). That's generally not a good idea, because the histories get confused, but I think I have now sorted this out. Your new page needs to be at this title, because of several other films called Waiting. The title Waiting (film) is back to being a redirect pointing to the "Film" section of the DAB page Waiting. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: This film was released in 2015 at Dubai Film Festival and it will be released in India on 29 April 2016. Now what should be the title "Waiting (2015 film)" or "Waiting (2016 film)"?. So I think it's better to move it to "Waiting (film)".--Musa Talk 22:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, because Waiting (film) also applies to several other films from 1991, 2005, 2007... Since 2016 is the general release date, and the article's lead paragraph refers to it, I think "2016" is preferable to "2015". JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Naseer Soomro
Please see my comments on Speedy deletion of Naseer Soomro.--Arif80s (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigyasa Singh (3rd nomination), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 23:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Constantly renominating Jigyasa Singh is disruptive editing.... Sources were provided in the previous AFD therefore renominating it "because it's unsourced" is rubbish, I would strongly suggest you stop renominating Jigyasa Singh for constant deletion otherwise you're going to end up blocked for a very long time!. –Davey2010Talk 23:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: Not disagreeing that repeated nominations can be disruptive, however can you back up your "very long too!" claim? --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: The article was unreferenced and information in it could be wrong so I nominated it. It wasn't a disruptive editing. User:EditorE said me in the 2nd nomination that you're playing and it will not work here and the way he said that could be a disruptive edit. I was not playing at all. I nominated it two times and every time the discussion was closed without a proper result.--Musa Talk 00:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ponyo - Editors who constantly renominate one article again and again can and do get blocked ... Sometimes for a few hours, sometimes indef ....
- Musa - You nominated an article saying "Unsourced" yet sources were provided, If you nominated the article and explained why the sources in the previous AFD wasn't sufficient then brilliant ... but you didn't .... –Davey2010Talk 00:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: Yes, I realize continued renominations can be disruptive, but saying emphatically "you're going to be blocked for a long time" is putting too much mustard on the bun, so to speak. You have no control either in deciding if a user is blocked or the duration. I can pretty much guarantee that it wouldn't be "a long time" or indef in this particular case. And Musa Raza, if you come across an unsourced BLP, please follow the WP:BLPPROD process, which will give the creator and interested parties seven days to find reliable sources if you have not or cannot do so.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ponyo - I should've said "You could end up blocked for a long time", You're right I don't but as I said I have seen editors blocked indef over it (Although I do admit that's only repeat offenders), Well I'm sure Musa won't do it so there's harm done :) –Davey2010Talk 18:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Ponyo and Davey2010: Someone said me that I'm playing but I wasn't. If he knew that I'm playing why didn't he improved the article by adding sources which he knew that exist. I nominated tha unreferenced article both times which is not wrong. And that's disruptive editing? Wow!--Musa Talk 00:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- But hang on .... Why didn't you add the sources ? .... You nominated the article - Sources were found in the article (and by myself) - AFD was closed as Speedy Keep - So therefore it's your responsibility to add the sources ....,
- You don't just renominate it because someone couldn't be arsed to add them months ago ..... Not only that but you clearly didn't follow BEFORE either which all editors must do before (re)nominating any article,
- Also I apologize if the above message seems harsh - Many, many editors renominate articles because they don't like the outcome and I assumed this was the case here so If I'm wrong then I sincerely apologize,,
- Anyway my best advice to you is either add the sources to the article or simply unwatch the page and move on away from it, Thanks and Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 00:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any source about the person. Thanks for the advice and Happy Editing.--Musa Talk 01:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Here's some On Google News......, No worries, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- I couldn't find them. And I've also removed the unsourced content from the article.--Musa Talk 01:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any source about the person. Thanks for the advice and Happy Editing.--Musa Talk 01:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- But hang on .... Why didn't you add the sources ? .... You nominated the article - Sources were found in the article (and by myself) - AFD was closed as Speedy Keep - So therefore it's your responsibility to add the sources ....,
- @Davey2010: Not disagreeing that repeated nominations can be disruptive, however can you back up your "very long too!" claim? --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Sanam Teri Kasam
The File:Sanam Teri Kasam 2016.jpeg you uploaded twice and then reverted back to the first one is not the actual album cover of Sanam Teri Kasam soundtrack, but a mere cover for the title track of the movie. Thearjun (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Mann Mayal
Im reverting your edits on Mann Mayal and merging the List of Episode article with the original one, the reason is that the series only last a season whereas such TV shows are always required to have their episodes table on their main page. If a series cross their first season then these articles and required to have a separate episode. Secondly the image you are using is not an Official cover for title track, if you want an image there kindly search for a proper cover or either remove the one you have added to maintain the proper shape with rules and regulation. If you have any question leave it on my talk page. Sammy.joseph (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Sammy.joseph: Your nomination for speedy deletion was changed into proposed deletion. And if you think if you're right then you should propose these articles as well List of Bashar Momin episodes, List of Main Abdul Qadir Hoon episodes, List of Numm episodes as well. And discuss the images on the talk page of the article.--Musa Talk 15:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Pakistan Times (1970).jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:The Pakistan Times (1970).jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)