User talk:Sector311

Welcome!

Hello, Sector311, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Muchness (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The unveiling.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The unveiling.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another image you uploaded, Image:Project86.JPG, is also missing a fair use rationale. --Muchness (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The unveiling.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The unveiling.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Project86promo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Project86promo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Project86promo.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 20:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Project86-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Project86-1-.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Steven Dail

A tag has been placed on Steven Dail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Steven Dail is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Steven Dail saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. EMT1871 (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Steven Dail

I have nominated Steven Dail, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Dail. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 15:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Dail. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Project86-1-.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Project86-1-.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Project86-1-.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:PromoProject86.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:PromoProject86.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PromoProject86.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:PromoProject86.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More personal attacks

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Back Breaker, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. J Milburn (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone would have to do more than that to offend me, and I don't think you are in any position to say who is close to personal attacks when you consider 'you were being snotty' as good explanation of why you attacked someone. I'm not quite sure where that even came from- rather than just saying something akin to 'no one cares if you don't like the policies', I actually bothered to explain why that policy exists. J Milburn (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice:

I know j milburn and all you need to use is a {{subst:Smile}} on his user page and it will be all over. :)

ps. please reply

BJ (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i am ben i am an experienced user on wikipedia and would like to adopt you to help the risk of vandalism and help you be a better person on wikipedia! cheers BJ (talk) 03:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: umm

this is to help you to become better at wikipedia and not go nuts and vandalise wikipedia, have a look at my user, then you'll see BJ (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Thats ok :) But don't go emo :)

and don't vandalise :)-dont do drugs

BJ (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

You've got your self a barnstar for doin the right thing on wikipedia:

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Here you go Sector311 BJ (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BJ (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Create a user page for your barn star or i will make you one and you fill in the things on the user ID bar.

finished

I finished you'r user page for you, all you need to do is to remove the ----- and the comments after editing, the title "sector311" is your bio and what you do for a living, Reply after you've done that yo'll be on you'r way, The barnstar, you can put that on your user page at the bottum.

ps. you r sooooooooo lucky

BJ (talk) 00:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:

Hi its me why do you want to know how to vandalise on wikipedia? Informantion on you'r email is not needed and i will make them hidden, please don't vandalise, you won't get any where on wikipedia the way you want to go, you said that you want some help.....Oo7565 will help you with wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjaco18 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi what kind of help do you needOo7565 (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

email

I added yo to my MSN so if you ever want a Quick conversation, i'm always here. Cheers ;)

B jacob (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Bjaco

I was not the person who blocked him last. I did block him in the past, but he was unblocked rather quickly. Ben received a large number of warnings and a lot of advice, but he failed to heed the warnings and, for the most part, ignored the advice. Basically, he wore the patience of many editors thin. You can read more about the different justifications for the block on his talk page. You should also note that, until he posted attempting to vilify me, I was offering him advice on what to do to get unblocked and even trying to defend his actions. If you look at the whole thing objectively, you'll see I was very supportive of him, and was actually very lenient in the early block in an attempt to give him the message that the way he was behaving was not appropriate. As you can see from his block log, he was then blocked by several other admins for various different things, and finally blocked indefinitely by Gwernol. After this, he continued to ignore my advice, and even claimed that I had not let him get over his first block/failed to help him out, which is patent nonsense. As I say, if you want a more in-depth discussion about why he was blocked, you should go and read his talk page, but, basically, Bjaco continued to be disruptive and behave in a way that was completely inappropriate and caused a lot of work for others, despite much advice and guidance (which he ignored) and many warnings, which he did not heed, from many different admins and other experienced users. He has also shown a level of immaturity. If you genuinely feel that Bjaco should not have been blocked after you have looked into his actions and read the discussion, you are welcome to discuss the matter with me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:DTaylor.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:DTaylor.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Tube

As you are probably aware, You Tube has recently come under fire in respect of its use of copyrighted works, because of this a review of You Tube linking from enwiki is under way.

It is noted that you linked to a number of You Tube videos from your user page. Sadly the (C) status for some of those video is doubtful or unclear. In general linking to material whose (C) Status is ambiguous, unclear or unconfirmed is highly discouraged on Wikipedia as reflects badly on both the project and the contributor.

If you are not the copyright owner in respect of the videos linked (including any music, screen-shots or computer generated content), please consider reading both (WP:EL) as well as You Tube's Terms and conditions.

If you don't own the copyright to the footage in entirety you should NOT upload it on You Tube either.

If you are indeed the copyright owner in entirety for the linked videos, please confirm this (via OTRS or appropriate means) for each and every video linked, and mention this in respect of the link(s) concerned.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Threat

This comment you made seems very threatening. I'd advise you not to threaten anyone or engage in personal attacks, or if the comment wasn't meant to be a threat, choose your words so that they couldn't be misinterpreted as such. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 21:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. We all get angry, but it's the ways that we handle our anger that define us. So, just do what I do, and walk away when I get angry. It will solve 99 out of 100 problems, trust me. Have a good day, Mastrchf (^t/_c) 03:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Apology

Don't worry about it, no harm done. I'm afraid I'm not active on MSN Messenger at the moment, I am between computers- I will probably get myself a new address once I get around to buying a new laptop. J Milburn (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block query

Hi there. You were never blocked in the first place. A vandal IP placed the block notice on a number of talk pages. Only administrators have the power to block, but anyone can place the notice on the talk page unfortunately. Your block log will be empty. Hope that helps. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back Breaker

Nope, not a fan- never even heard of them. Dunno how I became involved in the article. J Milburn (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Full Armor of God Broadcast

Comment The Full Armor of God Broadcast is facing deletion. Any advice, assistance or help would be much appreciated! Help represent NON-SELLOUT Christian Metal!! Help The Full Armor of God Broadcast keep giving the devil a blackeye on Wikipedia!Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 03:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Spokenlive.jpg

The file File:Spokenlive.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]