User talk:Seekraft~enwiki

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Seekraft! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- :) Dlohcierekim 13:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

:) Dlohcierekim 13:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your new articles...

...need a bit of expansion or something. It sounds like they're noteworthy but there are no sources listed. Read through WP:V real quick. Because the concepts are over the heads of quite a few of us, someone is likely to nominate them for deletion just because there's no context for them and many won't be able to assist because there are no primary sources listed to go by. Let me know if I'm not making any sense. The articles in question are:

Hbsag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Crtn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
ECRF (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
LVCF (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Inguinodynia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Clinical search organization (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

—Wknight94 (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chemicals

Thanks for your note.] I think you meant it for User talk:Wknight94. I'm not sure how to help you. Thanks, :) Dlohcierekim 12:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dlohcierekim,

I`m a trainee at a CRO in Starnberg, Bavaria, Germany. I think, that there is not enough biochemical, medical, chemical and genetical content in the Wikipedia. The articles I`ve posted, are technical terms for biochemical abbreviations. While working on clinical trial, I´m looking up words and names, especially the abbreviations, that are listed in the study protocols. The articles i wrote, come out of these study protocols (e.g. Roche) or they are translated from German into English by myself. Some definitions are a synthese of my knowledge and other articles. The definitions can be found easily with Google, too. I wish that there would be more medical data content for using Wikipedia as an unbeatable dictionary. I`m happy to answer any questions you may have.

Kind Regards,

Seekraft

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seekraft (talk • contribs) .

Yes, I think you meant to leave that message for me, Seekraft. The problem with your explanation is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. You might want to read WP:ISNOT including the Wikipedia is not a dictionary section. There is, however, a sister project called Wiktionary you might want to check out. For Wikipedia, each entry is supposed to be clear and is supposed to have sufficient context that even a layperson can understand it with little trouble - as well as have references and sources for each concept stated in the page. You also might want to read through WP:MOS and some of its subpages to get a feel for how articles are typically laid out here. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LVCF

Just to let you know. I've proposed LVCF for deletion for the reasons given on that page.

JASpencer 20:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Seekraft. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Seekraft~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)