User talk:Shane emihovich

Welcome!

Hello, Shane emihovich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Catherine Emihovich, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 01:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Shane Emihovich. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Catherine Emihovich, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 14:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shane emihovich What part of the first bullet point above is unclear? It appears that the subject is a member of your family, so you are asked not to edit the article about her. Please stop editing it. PamD 18:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Emihovich

Hallo Shane, I'm sorry for your loss of, at a guess, your grandmother (from "still in school" and "left 5 grandchildren"!). Or perhaps an aunt or other family member.

As people have said above, Wikipedia is cautious about edits by people with a "Conflict of interest". Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI and follow the instructions, to clarify that you are connected to her. Please also avoid editing without logging on: the recent edit history of the article shows a lot of edits by you and a lot by an anonymous editor. If that is you, it shouldn't be: please use your editor name all the time.

There are quite a few problems with the article as it stands, some of which probably predate your involvement with it.

The photo: you uploaded it saying "found on the internet". That's not a proper source, and there is no evidence that it is free of copyright. Please ask around the family to see if someone has a photo they have themselves taken (so they own the copyright) which they could upload. I fear that the one you uploaded will be deleted pretty soon, as Wikimedia is very careful about copyright.
Trivial but: section headings don't use capitals except for the first word and any proper nouns
And we don't leave a space before a reference, it goes straight after any punctuation
The references are not well formatted, though they are consistent. Unfortunately, consistently inadequate. A reference should show enough information that the reader can see the source of the information without having to click through the link or to scrutinise the URL to see its source. A reference to a website should also include "date retrieved", as websites change and disappear.
If a reference is re-used, there's a neat way to "name" it and re-use it so that it only appears once in the list. Easier to show than explain, so I'll fix the triplicate one I noticed.

Ah, I seem to have got a bit carried away and fixed most of the malformatted refs, also found archived copies of a couple of profile pages and done various bits of tidying up. So much for my plans for the afternoon! PamD 15:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you will look around and find some other articles to work on, and contribute to the encyclopedia in general, not just celebrating your family member. Though beware, it can become a time-sink! Happy Editing. PamD 15:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the kind words and edits. Through the editing I have done so far it is fun to but definitely time consuming. I have been passing on ideas slowly to my friends so my editing for this article should be done. Once again this was a huge help and big thanks! Shane emihovich (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you took the photograph you have uploaded repeatedly to Commons, it will keep getting deleted as a copyright violation because it appears on a copyrighted page.

Whoever took the photograph, that person is the copyright holder, and that person must release it to the Wikimedia Foundation under an acceptable free license because the Wikimedia Foundation does not have permission from the copyright holder to publish it, and we cannot take the word of some random user account. See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for instructions how to do this. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Pear (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SWinxy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently the draft has only videos by him. To have an article on Wikipedia, a YouTuber (like any other person) needs to have multiple secondary reliable sources about him. See WP:N.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Pear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SWinxy (talk) 01:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shane emihovich! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SWinxy (talk) 01:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Royal Pear

Hello, Shane emihovich. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Pear, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]