Jump to content

User talk:SilverLocust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This editor is a Veteran Editor IV and is entitled to display the Veteran Editor IV Ribbon.
Brilliant Idea Barnstar from ToBeFree
Bubble Tea from Whpq
baklava from Cremastra
Brilliant Idea Barnstar from ToBeFree
Technical Barnstar from ToBeFree
Scholarly Barnstar from Hydrangeans
Did you know ... that the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court case Department of State v. Muñoz decided that the fundamental right to marry does not give a U.S. citizen a right to challenge their spouse's visa denial? On the main page on 24 July 2024
Did you know ... that because the lord chancellor of England did not freeze assets before trial in 1789, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1999 that U.S. courts cannot either? On the main page on 25 October 2024
This user helped "Lisa Blatt" become a good article.
This user is an Arbitration clerk (trainee) on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to my talk page!

Alternatively, you can ping me on a discussion page by including {{Replyto|SilverLocust}} in a comment or contact me by email or on Discord.


A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Technical Barnstar
For the creation of Module:ACImplNotes/Proposal/Automatic, which is used through Template:ACImplNotes/Proposal/Automatic and with Template:ACImplNotes on proposed decision pages, resulting in automatic updates such as [1] vs. [2]. I thought we'd need a bot for this, and noone ever wrote one. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ToBeFree. (If only I could get as many barnstars from everyone else in total as I've gotten from you!) The module/template still needs some work — such as on what to do when the specified section name matches 0 or 2+ sections. SilverLocust 💬 05:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
😊
Well, if it currently doesn't, I think it should simply display a big red inconveniently design-/table-breaking error message. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added an error message. SilverLocust 💬 04:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it helps, consider this to be a barnstar from me, too! Thank you, SilverLocust! HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, HouseBlaster. SilverLocust 💬 04:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Keir Starmer on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lisa Blatt

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lisa Blatt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 10:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
  • Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed.
  • We plan to use the following schedule:
    • Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up
    • Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase
    • Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
  • If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lisa Blatt

[edit]

The article Lisa Blatt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lisa Blatt for comments about the article, and Talk:Lisa Blatt/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way...

[edit]

...I imagine someone's mentioned before, but just in case: if you're not thinking about an RfA, you should be. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saying so. I imagine that it doesn't come as a surprise that I'm looking to request those additional tools. SilverLocust 💬 07:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1. Very +1. Best, Reading Beans 08:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 10:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lisa Blatt

[edit]

On 4 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lisa Blatt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lisa Blatt, the first woman to argue 50 cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, "elicits laughs and the occasional sharp response from the justices"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lisa Blatt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lisa Blatt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Reviewer Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to SilverLocust for accumulating at least 50 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

[edit]

Worm Gear Award

This award is given in recognition to SilverLocust for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

[edit]

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
  • The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (disambiguation)

[edit]

Hello, thanks for moving the Pennsylvania article. I followed the discussion, but didn't comment. There's a new-ish dab page at Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (disambiguation). Should Attempted assassination of Donald Trump now redirect there? That doesn't seem to have been addressed in the discussion. Wikishovel (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel: Well I moved the article for the closer, but I'm not the closer. Cyberdog958 may be willing to clarify whether the discussion led to a conclusion on what to do with Attempted assassination of Donald Trump when moved. As to my own opinion, I didn't see rebuttal that the Pennsylvania event was a primary topic, so I would leave it as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. (If there is WP:NOPRIMARY, then Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (disambiguation) should be swapped to Attempted assassination of Donald Trump.) SilverLocust 💬 08:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good points. I don't have an opinion on primary topic, just trying to maintain that new dab page, and I'll be glad to hear opinions on whether it should be renamed, or my last edit there reverted per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. If that takes another rename discussion, that's fine too, I'm in no rush. Wikishovel (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikishovel: To me, it looks like the redirect should be left as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT with the hatnote left in place. Per the multiple editors that brought up WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and the pageviews of the two separate articles, it seems like the majority of people navigating to the redirect are trying to reach the newly moved article and not the one in Florida. I would include a link to the dab page at the top, though, possible replacing the Security incidents involving Donald Trump link. cyberdog958Talk 08:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've reverted the dab page, with Attempted assassination of Donald Trump back at the top as PRIMARYREDIRECT, and updated the hatnote at the Pennsylvania article. That does fine for now, and if the situation changes, the dab page can always be changed again later. Thanks for your quick replies. Wikishovel (talk) 09:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The base name should almost never redirect to the disambiguated title. If it does, then there is a primary topic and the page should be located at the base name instead. Actual examples of primary redirects would be Einstein to Albert Einstein, Olympics to Olympic Games, or, in rarer cases, Jacksonville to Jacksonville, Florida (because of WP:USPLACE). This is no different than if Attempted assassination of Donald Trump redirected to Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (July 2024), a classic example of |unnecessary disambiguation. That being said, I think the closing statement should've gone into more detail about specifically what consensus was found in the discussion. C F A 💬 01:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CFA: What WP:MISPLACED actually says is that "a base name should not be a redirect to a page with the base name plus a parenthetical disambiguator." That is not the case here. SilverLocust 💬 02:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but the same thing applies to the base name plus non-parenthetical disambigators. Attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Pennsylvania could easily be Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (Pennsylvania) or Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (July 2024). C F A 💬 02:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If that were so, 2024 Summer Olympics would need to be moved to 2024 Olympics and Brown v. Board of Education would be need to be moved to Brown v. Board. The word "parenthetical" is not in that sentence extraneously. SilverLocust 💬 02:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, because those qualifiers aren't "disambiguators" — they aren't disambiguating from anything — and instead just form alternative names for the same page. C F A 💬 02:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll concede that those two examples I gave don't rebut the rule you're suggesting. But WP:NCWWW is fairly clear that the "when", "where", and "what" of an event can be included for descriptive purposes rather than purely to disambiguate from other topics. Its example of 1993 Russian constitutional crisis is illustrative, where the 1993 adds extra description over the somewhat ambiguous (but nonetheless WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT) title Russian constitutional crisis. SilverLocust 💬 06:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CFA: As I stated in my close, there was consensus to move the article per WP: CONSISTENT and WP:PRECISE. As far as the primary topic, it was brought up a lot by opposers that the attempt in Pennsylvania is the primary and it was never really refuted by the supporters, but that wasn’t the subject of the discussion and wasn’t ever brought into question. The entire reason there is a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT section is for this exact reason. And WP:MISPLACED states that if topic-specific naming conventions dictate the use of a disambiguator, it should redirect to the primary topic. As SilverLocust said, WP:NCWWW says that events should be titled with when, what, and where. It’s naturally disambiguated and WP:MISPLACED doesn’t apply. Your welcome to bring the redirect up in WP:RFD, though. cyberdog958Talk 13:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue this any further, but NCWWW was essentially never brought up in the discussion. Most participants wanted to move for the sole goal of disambiguating the two attempts (and thus "in Pennsylvania" is equivalent to parenthetical disambiguation), not because they thought the current title failed event title policy. It's pointless to redirect a base name to a disambiguated name (on the basis that apparently there is a primary topic). If there is a primary topic, the page should be located at the base name. If there isn't a primary topic, then there should be a disambiguation page at the base name. Your close makes no mention of whether there is consensus on a primary topic, so now we're stuck with this half-solution. C F A 💬 14:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion to move Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (disambiguation) to Attempted assassination of Donald Trump has now been started at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (disambiguation)#Requested move 11 October 2024. This will hopefully resolve the above confusion. GTrang (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Candidate instructions

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Instructions for candidates

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2024 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 15–21: SecurePoll setup phase
  • October 22–24: Discussion phase
  • October 25–31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–?: Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the SecurePoll setup phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend the SecurePoll setup phase from October 15–21 getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 22–24. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as a request for adminship (RfA). Please make sure you are around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RfA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must have received at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

You're receiving this message because you are a candidate in the October 2024 administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our Admin Election Test

[edit]

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, LindsayH. My well wishes to you too, and I hope this first run leads to a less daunting process than RfA has been. SilverLocust 💬 15:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.

[edit]

On 25 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that because the lord chancellor of England did not freeze assets before trial in 1789, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1999 that U.S. courts cannot either? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

[edit]
Scholarly Barnstar
Having seen lots of articles about historically significant (but not popularly famous) court decisions with citations only to the judges' or justices' opinions, it was a very nice change of pace to notice in the DYK box today the well-put-together Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. and its citation of scholarly sources from the secondary literature published in law journals. Thank you for creating it! Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 07:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Hydrangeans! I didn't really expect much of anyone to be interested in this case, but equity jurisprudence is an area that interests me, and I ended up putting a good bit of effort into it relative to the small number of views it is likely to receive. SilverLocust 💬 07:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a review on article

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your timely help last time on Game Science by helping move the page and also marking it as reviewed for my autopatrol status.

I have another article 01.AI that has been moved by a page mover but not marked as reviewed as user does not have the right. When you are free, can you please help mark this article as reviewed? Thanks Imcdc Contact 15:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's something I'm generally willing to do for autopatrolled users. SilverLocust 💬 18:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. - Imcdc Contact 00:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query re: Arbcom matter

[edit]

Thank you for your notifications and replies in the Arbcom matter regarding Yasuke.

I have had a number of IRL issues this past month, which have impeded my ability to participate in this process. Is there any value in my posting anything on the related pages at this point? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eirikr. You are welcome to post comments about the proposed decision in a new section of the talk page ("Comments by Eirikr"). At this point in time, the workshop and evidence phases are closed. I couldn't say whether commenting now would have much value, though it would probably be less likely to influence the final decision than participation earlier in the process. The Arbitration Committee does expect editors "to respond to statements about themselves; failure to do so may result in decisions being made without their participation". SilverLocust 💬 20:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]

On your election as a news admin! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A very impressive result—thoroughly well-deserved. Congratulations! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Massive congratulations, SilverLocust! Highest support percentage, too! HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! I have high confidence in your admin ability. I picked up your shirt this afternoon. Cremastra (uc) 00:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Raladic (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hawkeye7: Thank you; I endeavor to administer the news [sic] wisely. SilverLocust 💬 05:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Extraordinary Writ and HouseBlaster: I think that my very kind nominators had a lot to do with how high the percentage ended up. Thank you again! SilverLocust 💬 05:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra: Thank you for the traditional svg, Cremastra. I consider you trustworthy, so I'll trust your judgment that I'm worthy of being trusted. SilverLocust 💬 05:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Raladic: Thank you! The tools I've always liked the most are the page mover ones, so I'm happy that you've been taking that up recently as well. SilverLocust 💬 06:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't participate much in the admin elections but I just noticed the "A" by your username, courtesy of a script I installed, and thus discovered you were now an administrator. Congratulations! Don't hesitate to ask questions when they arise (and they will). Good luck! Liz Read! Talk! 08:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, Liz. If I have a question, I might ping you come to your very busy talk page. (I use a similar script to underline usernames with various colors based on user group.) SilverLocust 💬 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin Bâtonnets

[edit]
I may not be able to offer you the baton, but I hope you can savour these bâtonnets as you study all the new admin buttons! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...here's the baton!

[edit]
The new admin baton
From one AELECT winner to another, congratulations! Here is the fabled baton – please play around with and twirl it, but make sure to give it to the next admin once you're done. Happy mopping! charlotte 👸♥ 01:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neeraj Singh Lodhi

[edit]

Hey, thanks for moving the page "Neeraj Singh Lodhi"! After your move, I can now edit the page, but when I tried to rate it using "Rater," I found I still can't edit its talk page. Could you please either rate it or create the talk page as well? After that, I’ll take over. Thanks again, and congratulations on being elected as an Admin! GrabUp - Talk 08:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You can change the talk page now. Thank you for the congratulations. SilverLocust 💬 09:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

[edit]
Congrats on winning the adminship. Just a little something to sweeten the palate. Wikibear47 (talk) 18:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Wikibear47. I believe I've had stroopwafels once when visiting the Netherlands. (Though I don't recall it in much detail; I think I was around 7 years old.) SilverLocust 💬 19:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"He who does not keep peace shall lose his hand."

[edit]
The axe of responsibility
Shiny new tools might be used to mete out justice, mercy or a dose of reality. Let us commit to not losing our cool when using them. Our only armor is the entire community's trust. We wear it for each other, each new contributor, and each new generation to come. May you ever be the community's champion.
BusterD (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding WP:RMUM for DXDJ

[edit]

Were you aware this had been recently discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDJ? I don't particularly care much either way, but it seems odd to override a recent AfD result. olderwiser 01:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was aware that deleting or redirecting the disambiguation page was discussed. The move wasn't discussed. SilverLocust 💬 01:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diffs for WPO and Marine if Current RFAR is Oversighted

[edit]

As far as I know, the two diffs are linked as archive of declined cases, would you prepare in the likely event that current RFAR is oversighted? Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The members of the committee are all suppressors, so it wouldn't be hard to get a copy of suppressed revisions, but I've copied them since you've asked. SilverLocust 💬 02:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]