Jump to content

User talk:Storialist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barlamane (April 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello CommanderWaterford, and thank you for your quick answer. Can you please explain what is not reliable in the sources that I have shared. I have appended 8 quality sources for the article, including known organizations such as HRW, Freedom House, and le Desk, who made a full investigation about this website. I do not think that there is an article in the NewYork Times or BBC about this website, but it is not a reason to say that other sources are not reliable. Can you please elaborate more on the sources aspect, given that what I put in the article is the best sources you could find about this matter, and that it is a notable subject in Morocco, the country where I come from. There is even an article in French about the same subject, with the same sources.
Thank you in advance for clarifying.-- Storialist (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Storialist Sure, those are unfortunately all passing mentions and not in-depth, independent coverage ��Wikipedia:SIGCOV which is needed to establish sufficient notability per Wikipedia:NORG. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CommanderWaterford Hello again. I am not really understanding the argument that you are mentioning (i.e. those are unfortunately all passing mentions and not in-depth, independent coverage). Can you explain to me please how this full in depth independent investigation made by an independent famous media in Morocco, and just dedicated for "Barlamane", is not fulfilling the criteria that you are mentioning of "in-depth" and "independence"? I would appreciate your answer as this will help us go forward. Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CommanderWaterford - Can you please answer my last question or guide me to contact some admin who can look into that matter if you do not have time? Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
First of all you need at least three of those sources, you have (perhaps) one. Secondly your source is not able to be translated so english Reviewers are not able to evaluate it. Lastly as far as I see this article is not dedicated only to your subject, so I am sorry but it does not fit. You can for sure resubmit to see if another reviewer is of different opinion but I would be surprised. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CommanderWaterford - I know that you do not have time, but have you gone through all the sources I have provided before you gave your conclusions? Also to my knowledge it is not an obligation to have sources in English, unless you want to keep English Wikipidia only about USA and UK subjects. Can you connect me with an admin who speaks French? I think they will be more helpful and understanding? Thank you. -- Storialist (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Storialist! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grand'mere Eugene was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grand'mere Eugene was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barlamane (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defamation Press in Morocco (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:14, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barlamane

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Storialist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barlamane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Storialist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defamation Press in Morocco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Storialist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defamation Press in Morocco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]