User talk:TD-Linux

This is TD-Linux's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shawn Wasabi (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shawn Wasabi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TD-Linux, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shawn Wasabi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shawn Wasabi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shawn Wasabi

Hello, TD-Linux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shawn Wasabi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (Help!) 20:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the Twitter thread. I would like to explain to epople what reliable osurces means so they can help instead of reverting advertising material back in as Diamond145 is doing. Guy (Help!) 21:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you found it. TD-Linux (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks. Will try and help. Guy (Help!) 21:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW a lot of the consternation is because some people feel like articles on e.g. AV1's competitor HEVC aren't held to the same standard - they are also largely infodumps of the spec. The AV1 article was in worse shape, but one way to proceed would be to make new sections in the AV1 article that correspond to the equivalent sections in the HEVC article. TD-Linux (talk) 21:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the thing: the way to fix the article not saying what you want, is to bring better sources. There's way too much self-sourced material. Please please find reliable independent secondary sources, or just put a single link back to a page on the AVI website that says it all. We're not a HOWTO, we're not an indiscriminate collection of information, we're not a glossary or gazeteer. Please see WP:NOT. Guy (Help!) 14:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]