User talk:Tedster41

Welcome!

Hi Tedster41! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inferno Records (dance label) (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inferno Records (dance label) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inferno Records (dance label), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tedster41! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Inferno Records (dance label)

Hello, Tedster41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inferno Records (dance label), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inferno Records (dance label)

Hello, Tedster41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inferno Records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Out of the Blue (System F song) has been accepted

Out of the Blue (System F song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add a new article to This Life please

It is an article Molarinoye09 (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What page are you talking about? The This Life album page doesn't need any new articles associated with it, as the ensuing tour and singles have been added as articles. If you're talking about the song "This Life", that page is currently just a redirect page, you can see for yourself. If you want to make that page, that's up to you. But as of yet, that page is not an article; it's a redirect.

Also, you haven't replied to my comment on your talk page about how your profile page is just a direct copy of mine. If you haven't seen it, you can use your watchlist to keep track of when people edit your talk page or pages you've made. Tedster41 (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add links to This Life (Take That song) please Molarinoye09 (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read my reply? The page does not exist. It is a redirect, not an article. If you want to make it an article, go right ahead, but that's your job, not mine. If you do that, you can add the links without asking me.

Secondly, you still haven't changed your profile page to something that isn't a direct copy of mine. Please change it, as it counts as plagarism. Tedster41 (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a new article. Molarinoye09 (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GG

	Single Pringle
	Nice job arguing for the tracklist on 1962-1966 PokéRen 11:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what flavour is it Tedster41 (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

grape PokéRen 11:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:You and Me (Take That song) cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:You and Me (Take That song) cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respect WP:BRD and wait for a consensus

Your recent editing history at 96 Months shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 19:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: Hi AO. Yesterday I reverted an editor on 96 Months and asked them to join a discussion that Tedster41 started on the talk page. Tedster41 manually reverted my edit earlier, claiming that because the last talk-page reply (mine) was a month ago that therefore means there "won't be any consensus beyond this"(?). Even though consensus is not a simple tally, 3–2 votes in favour is not a compelling nor clear enough consensus [1] (and one of those editors has not yet joined the talk page discussion anyway). Could you please ask this user to respect resolving this on the talk page and not restoring their preferred edit that does not have clear consensus? Thanks. Ss112 19:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, If I'm being honest, this is a little too far here. So, to recount, you've reverted my edit (fair) and left another message on the talk page (again fair). But now you've come over here, as if I didn't get the point already, told me not to do the thing you've already told me not to do, and then asked someone else to do the same. Mate. I understand. I'm not a Neanderthal. Calm down.

My point in the edit was the fact that 96 Months, as a page, is not the most... enthralling of topics. I doubt many people will ever come back to the talk page to discuss the topic. The album's dropped (or dropping) off of most charts now. I doubt people will come back to the page and have a deep discussion on one piece of wording within it.

I saw the edit someone else had made as confirmation of my point, talk page or not. Hoping to get the issue squared away, I assumed that was enough and reverted your edit once.

I've seen edit wars. Hell, I was part of one a while ago that lead to a long and winding discussion. I know we're all here just to try and make a free encyclopaedia, but from my end, this seemed like a massive overreaction from one revert.

For the time being, until more people appear to discuss the topic (which I think will never happen, so we'll just have to settle for compromise rather than an answer), we'll have to leave the page as it is. Yes, there's evidence to sway in each direction, but that's why we discuss. The only issue is, if not many people want to discuss, then there's not going to be a consensus. That's what I was worried about and that's why I took the quick decision to make that revert. I wanted the issue dealt with, but I now see clearly that that's not how this is going to go. Tedster41 (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ All, please discuss this on the relevant talk page. I'm not seeing any need for admin intervention at this time. Thank you both for your contributions to the project. Regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]