User talk:Tesleemah

Welcome to WP:MED!

Hi, I saw your post on the talk page. It is great to have you here! I help organize a collaboration with the Cochrane Collaboration and WIkipedia to improve health articles. If you are interested in learning more please let me know.

JenOttawa (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out. Yes I'm interested, kindly tell me more Tesleemah (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	thanks for correcting my definition for a barnstar so heres one for you :) Stuuf7 (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

wow!

Thank you for the honour Tesleemah (talk) 12:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Help with improving my draft

Hello Teseleemah,

I noticed you work on Nigerian articles, I would really appreciate it if you could help me with checking out my draft article on a Nigerian film director Dare Olaitan, for any grammatical error or lack of reference.

Thank you for your time. Aivrie (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Alright, I have worked and refined the article. There were some weavil and exaggerated words which I removed. I also removed statements without references, refined your tone and Added more references.

You can also cross-check for the last time before final submission.

Well done, you've done a great job! Tesleemah (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ilesa, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

What's it all about? I looked through but I can't find list of articles that are of interest

And how can I be of help? Tesleemah (talk) 02:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Its about improving Wikipedia’s coverage of oral tradition. It’s very nascent, we’re discussing the scope at the moment and your opinion would be greatly appreciated, and then it’s the tagging and assessment tables. Maybe watch the page as next steps will likely come up on the talk page? Kowal2701 (talk) 06:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Alright, that's fine. I will be on the lookout. Do let me know if I can assist with anything. Tesleemah (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Btw, to join just add your name under ==Participants==, if you look at ==To do== there's some stuff there if you're looking for something to do lol, but your time is valuable so no worries if not Kowal2701 (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

No problem, I will. I have been trying to sign up as a participant but network here is unstable. I will try again later. Tesleemah (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Moved discussion

Over at User talk:Adimora chidinma you said, "I'm referring to Nigeria community, even thou English is not our native language however must editors are literate, so we need just more push and support to gain insight to editing on English Wikipedia." I've seen a number of high quality edits from the Nigeria community. But, as we'd expect from any group of new editors, some problems as well. What stands out is a lot of article creations for subjects who fail WP:NOTE. These articles generally appear to be spam. Article creation is hard and I'd strongly suggest new editors work to expand existing articles with quality reliable sources (WP:RS) instead of creating new articles. If editors really insist on working on new articles despite that advice, I'd strongly urge them to very clearly emphasize WP:NOTE and WP:RS so it is incredibly clear to the reviewers that the new draft article satisfies those policies. On the other hand, for more experienced editors with a strong understanding of WP:NOTE and WP:RS, I'd definitely encourage them to work on article creation, especially about topics of interest to Nigerians. In general, the quality of written English exceeds that of other communities where English is a second language. That's great! I'd very, very strongly urge new editors to avoid AI entirely. It's very hard to use ChatGPT in an appropriate manner on Wikipedia (much, much easier outside of Wikipedia!) and very easy to accidentally use ChatGPT in a manner that's actively harmful to the project. Finally, I haven't seen this as a significant problem within your community, but WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE is notoriously difficult, especially around images. A very simple and easy to remember rule is not to upload any image unless you personally took it with your own camera, and not to copy-and-paste text from anywhere else. And finally, Wikipedia has a lot of policies and guidelines and they can be overwhelming. WP:5P is a good place to start. Let me know if you have any questions! --Yamla (talk) 13:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the feedback, I will share them with my community so as to reduce the rate of disruptive editing. Tesleemah (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Request writing about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386)

Hello, Tesleemah, Would you like to write about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the YO Wikipedia? The asteroid named after her already exists for the YO Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if it is done. Boss-well63 (talk) 20:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Alright, I will look into it Tesleemah (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Tesleemah, What's your opinion after looking into it? I'm curious... Someone wrote about the 'medication' she used. Boss-well63 (talk) 12:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi!..

I have been busy with quote a lot, I will draft something about it soon. Kindly exercise more patience Tesleemah (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brain Jotter has been accepted

Brain Jotter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the review Tesleemah (talk) 10:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Tesleemah, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I will put good use to the new user right Tesleemah (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Happy Belated Birthday!

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness.DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much, I appreciate.

Not a problem at all, I got a birthday wish here on 12th too. Tesleemah (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Yay! :) I hope you had a lovely birthday! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, thank you ⚡⚡ Tesleemah (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alu-Oshaeraen Shrine

Hi there, I have just reverted three of your edits (1, 2, 3) where you prematurely relisted an AfD discussion. Please note that AfDs are typically closed (or relisted) only after exactly 7 days—this equates to 168 hours or 10,080 minutes. These must fully elapse before a discussion can be closed or relisted. I am sure the WP:XFDCloser tool warned you, but I am not sure why you still went ahead. In this case, the discussion was clearly initiated at 22:42, 29 November 2024 (Wikipedia time) and should only be closed or relisted at 22:42, 6 December 2024 (Wikipedia time). But you relisted this discussion at 12:21, 6 December 2024, which was too early and unnecessary too because consensus was already established before your premature relist. It is unnecessarily time-consuming to revert three edits on an issue that could have been avoided. I strongly recommend that you read the guidance on AfDs to ensure you fully understand the process and expectations before contributing further. Happy editing. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for coming here @Vanderwaalforces

I relisted seeing it it's already 7 days ago, I was not aware exact time plays a factor too seeing [[1]] AfD was relisted by @Liz at 8:42am not 4:25pm (I have read the AFD closer instruction and I have been observing the closure of some)):).

Also User:Vanderwaalforces are you saying two votes are enough to establish consensus? Seeing that you tagged my relisting unnecessary. Tesleemah (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Oh yes, Tesleemah. Reiterating that, for non-admins, it must elapse. If an admin decides to close or relist a discussion before time, then they have a reason for it, and they’re accountable. So avoid doing that in the future.

Yes, two unanimous delete !votes are clear-cut consensus that the article should be deleted. In fact, in non-controversial cases, articles are soft-deleted even if there’s only one delete !vote.

Got that? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Kazem Najafi Elmi

You recently accepted Kazem Najafi Elmi at Article for Creation (AFC). However, the article does not appear to have been properly reviewed before acceptance. For future submissions, please ensure the articles are properly formatted or leave them for another reviewer. Here are some observations for improvement:

1. Career Section: The section is written in bullet points, which is not ideal. It would be more appropriate to present this information in prose format.

2. References: In reference 1, only this link is verifiable out of the group of sources.

3. See Also Section: The section is misused, linking to the Iranian president and including an external link as a reference, which is not appropriate.

4. Post-Acceptance Review: Since you are also a new page reviewer and you are sure that the article meets the notability criteria:, you could review the article immediately after accepting it. This would help reduce the New Page Patrol (NPP) backlog and prevent unnecessary questions on my talk page too.

Happy editing. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Ibjaja055

I just looked at the errors in the articles, indeed that was an oversight from my end. I have taken my time to cleanup the article and removed the "see also" section. Some of the references are in Arabic and I can also spot more than one that are verifiable, I believe they are notable and more improvement could be done. I have also reviewed the article from my end. Thanks for calling my attention to this oversight of mine. Kind regards. Tesleemah (talk) 12:37, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tesleemah hello

Please help me to show up in Google search. tanks. Mehrhashtom (talk) 13:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

It will show after few days, do exercise patience and continue working on improving the article. Tesleemah (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tesleemah well noted. Thank you for your quick response. Mehrhashtom (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Help improve

Hello dear, please help me improve on this page and necessary clean up DeeYasso thank you Tarone Winstonn (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Tarone Winstonn

I just reviewed the page and thank you for creating articles around Nigerian Artiste, however I don't have the time to clean it up right now. I will add neccesary tags if I spot any. Tesleemah (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

About Tianjin Real Estate Group

Tianjin Real Estate Group is a significant state-owned enterprise (SOE) in China, with a diverse portfolio encompassing real estate development, infrastructure investment, hotel management, and construction services. As one of Tianjin’s largest local government financing vehicles (LGFVs), the group plays a critical role in urban development. Recently, its debt challenges have drawn substantial attention from global financial and investment communities, with coverage from outlets such as Bloomberg​.

Media and Research Reports: A simple Google search reveals extensive news articles and investment analyses about the group, including evaluations from international authorities like Bloomberg and S&P Global Ratings. This demonstrates its influence beyond local markets.

Listed Subsidiary: The group operates through several publicly listed subsidiaries, which classify it as a statutory public entity in the financial sector. This status inherently increases its transparency and impact.​

Asset Scale: Based on the latest available data, Tianjin Real Estate Group shows its significant financial scale and industry influence. As of 2023, the company's total liabilities reached approximately $276 billion, with shareholder equity at around $76 billion. These figures highlight its critical role in the financial and real estate sectorsAlthough exact figures vary, Tianjin Real Estate Group is a major player in China’s real estate and infrastructure industries, contributing significantly to local development and public infrastructure projects. Considering its scale, public accountability, and the global focus on its financial difficulties, the group meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Its importance in both municipal and national economic contexts further justifies its inclusion as a topic of interest.

I appreciate your attention to detail. If you need any further assistance, feel free to let me know! Amazingloong (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Well, I reviewed the article and I see that it contain news about just one event, which is the case of debt. Without adding more content to proof the notability, you should not have removed the tag. I won't drag this with you while I leave the page for other reviewers to do justice. Tesleemah (talk) 13:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Oh well... Drafted! Tesleemah (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Mainspring Energy

You wrote: " Comment: Editor seems to be connected with the article and going to their page, there is no COI declared Tesleemah (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)". When I go to the talk page of Shemsea, I find the following:

"Declaring no COI Often, when an article about a company is created, the creating editor is asked if they have a financial or personal connection to the company. If neither, a simple statement to that effect here would be appropriate. David notMD (talk) 09:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the Suggestion. I have no COI. I have no financial ties to the company. I learned of its existence about 3 weeks ago due to their contracting with a government agency, with which I am also not employed, but occasionally attend their public meetings. Shemsea (talk) 14:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)"

It appears that no COI was declared 4 days prior to you writing that no COI was declared.

Also, editor DavidnotMD has commented as follows on his talk page:

"Draft: Mainspring Energy Thank you kindly for taking an interest in this article, and making some improvements to it. You will note from my past editing that I have an interest in nuclear energy/nunclear physics. This Mainspring Energy is a novel company I learned about a few weeks ago. I believe they make an excellent product, and they will become very successful. While it is a branch of chemical energy (they can burn fossil fuel, or biogas, etc.), I found their approach to energy production to be quite novel and worthy of an article. Shemsea (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Shemsea Your statement on your Talk page is sufficient to make clear that you do not have a conflict of interest. David notMD (talk) 15:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)"

You might wish to edit your comment. It is clear there is no COI.

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Tesleemah, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Apology

I want to apologize for not re-visiting your request at WP:PERM/NPR, but what I want to apologize most for is the back and forth that occurred between Joe and I. That was not the place for the spat, and it was inappropriate for both of us to engage to the extent that we did. I wish you the best of luck with reviewing and I encourage you to start with what you're most familiar with at WP:NPPSORT, skip what you're unsure about, and ask any and all questions you may have at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers. There's plenty of folks who are always eager to help coach and talk things out. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

thank you, I appreciate Tesleemah (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)