User talk:Thatguy232

January 2023

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Stacker 2, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Teb (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Stacker 2, you may be blocked from editing. Teb (talk) 19:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Stacker 2. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further disruptive, promotional edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I work for the Brand Stacker2 and I am trying to update this misleading wikipedia page. I have given reasons for my last two edits and why they needed to be updated. Thatguy232 (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well then that's just undeclared paid editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that. That's my fault. I just read the entire article on that and didn't know I had to do all of that before editing. Thatguy232 (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thatguy232, I'm not blaming you for undeclared paid editing, nor does it affect the block reason. Providing the disclosure before learning about the paid editing policy is commendable, though, of course. It helps to understand what and why you have been doing, and makes clear that you are not here with bad intentions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely zero bad intentions. I'm just trying to share more information for our company. Thatguy232 (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatguy232: Wikipedia is uninterested in what a company wishes to say about itself. Articles summarize what reliable and independent sources have chosen to write about a subject. If there are obvious factual errors that you feel are in need of correction or deletion, please learn how to make edit requests and post these on the article's talk page. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]