User talk:TheAustinMan/Archive 6

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes in June 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southside, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane

The article 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Barry (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1915 Galveston hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabine River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1915 Galveston hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isobar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

38th edition of The Hurricane Herald - You are the Member of the Month!

Volume XIV, Issue 38, August 1, 2019

The Hurricane Herald is the arbitrarily periodical newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006; it has been almost thirteen years since that time. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from June 1–July 31, 2019. This edition's editor and author is ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) .

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.

← 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 →

Storm of the month and other tropical activity

Hurricane Barry was the wettest tropical storm on record in Arkansas, and one of only four hurricanes to strike Louisiana in July. Originating from a trough over the southeastern United States, Barry formed on July 11 off the southeast Louisiana coast. Despite wind shear and an asymmetrical structure, the storm intensified into a minimal hurricane before making landfall near Intracoastal City, Louisiana. Barry dropped heavy rainfall from the Gulf of Mexico to the Ohio Valley, peaking at 23.43 in (595 mm) near Ragley, Louisiana. The storm caused flooding rains, power outages, and one death due to rip currents. Damage totaled over US$500 million.

The Atlantic hurricane season, and the Central Pacific hurricane season, began on June 1. The 2019-20 tropical cyclone year in the Southern Hemisphere began on July 1 in the South-West Indian Ocean, Australian region, and South Pacific.
Since the last newsletter, 18 other systems have formed worldwide, in addition to Barry.
Western Pacific
In the Western Pacific, Tropical Storm Sepat in June passed near Japan and was classified as a subtropical storm by the JTWC. In early July, Tropical Storm Mun killed two people when it struck Vietnam. Tropical Storm Danas formed near the Philippines and moved northward, later crossing the Korean peninsula. Toward the end of July, Tropical Storm Nari moved across Japan as a tropical depression, and Tropical Storm Wipha struck southern China. There were also three tropical depressions, one of which the JTWC classified as a tropical storm.
Eastern Pacific
After the latest start of a hurricane season since 1971, activity in the basin began on June 25 when Hurricane Alvin formed off the southwest coast of Mexico. Hurricane Barbara became a strong Category 4 hurricane, and its remnants later caused power outages in Hawaii. Tropical Storm Cosme, Tropical Depression Four-E, Tropical Storm Dalila, and hurricanes Erick, and Flossie also formed in July southwest of Mexico.
Atlantic
Short-lived Tropical Depression Three formed near the Bahamas and dissipated east of Florida in late July
North Indian Ocean

Cyclone Vayu was a powerful cyclone that threatened western India, but stalled and weakened significantly before moving ashore. The storm killed eight people, and lashed western India with heavy rainfall and high tides.

South-West Indian Ocean

In late July, Zone of Disturbed Weather 01 lasted for a few days east of Madagascar in the southern hemisphere winter.

Recent storms of the month
Edition	Storm
37	Cyclone Kenneth
36	Cyclone Idai
35	Typhoon Wutip (2019)

Member of the month (edition) – TheAustinMan

TheAustinMan has been involved with WPTC since 2009. Since the last newsletter, TheAustinMan worked on the Storm of the Month (Barry), as well as 1915 Galveston hurricane, Typhoon Alice (1979), 1937 Atlantic hurricane season, 1944 Jamaica hurricane, and the 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane. A prolific editor, TheAustinMan has contributed to three featured articles and 46 good articles. Thank you for your contributions!

New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter in June/July 2019

More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue in May 2019. Sorted chronologically. Struckout users denote users who have left or have been banned.

DavidTheMeteorologist (talk · contribs)
ThePacificMan (talk · contribs)

To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!

Current assessment table

Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics.
As of this issue, there are 152 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 142 A-class articles, but that number is subject to change, depending if we mandate that all A-class articles have an A-class review first. There are 961 good articles, meaning it is possible we get to our 1000th GA by the end of the year. There are only 62 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 363 C-class articles, 717 start-class articles, and 141 stub-class articles, with 26 lists and 9 current articles. The number of lists may decrease further as the "Tropical cyclone X" articles continue to be reclassified as set index articles. These figures mean that more than half of the project is rated a GA or better - including the lists/current/future articles, there are 1283 articles that are below GA status, versus 1325 that are GA or better.

About the assessment scale →

Sourcing guidelines, by TheAustinMan

The core content policies on Wikipedia (neutral point of view, no original research, and verifiability) all apply to articles tagged by WikiProject Tropical cyclones. The project's style guidelines also provide information on how to cite sources effectively. Relevant guidelines discussing the WikiProject's tropical meteorology articles may also be found at WP:SCICITE and WP:SCIRS.

Reports, bulletins, and other products issued by Regional Specialized Meteorological Centers are the authoritative source on meteorological information pertaining to tropical cyclones in their respective basins. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information about a storm's characteristics, including intensities, durations, and locations. The most recent post-storm assessments take precedence over operational data. Thus, post-season revisions to a storm's "best track" file, new information presented in a tropical cyclone report, or official database adjustments made by the Atlantic hurricane reanalysis project, or other official reanalyses supersede operational information where they disagree. Data in operational RSMC products can still be used if later data does not dispute them. Information from other public agencies can also be used, but generally require in-text attribution. While the original best track data from meteorological agencies is a reliable source and can be referenced, readers often find difficulty interpreting them. Consider using IBTrACS, a more easily understandable track database, which is endorsed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), for this information. Because the Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System (ATCF) used by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center and National Hurricane Center is liable to change frequently in realtime, they should not be used for currently active storms. Forecasts from these agencies and RSMCs should only be used to cite the forecasts themselves; in other words, they can only be used to describe what was expected to occur, and never to describe what did occur.

Maps and other graphics published by meteorological agencies may be used to describe events (see the associated essay). However, they should only be referenced if they are explicit in conveying the supported information and do not require any rigorous meteorological interpretation (such as satellite analysis or drawing conclusions over what the arrangement of meteorological features represents). In general, self-published sources should not be used as sources for present or historical storm intensities. However, information contained in articles from reliable sources or commentary from established tropical cyclone experts can be used as sources for information not covered by WMO-endorsed agencies. If such sources dispute WMO-endorsed meteorological data, commentary on the disputed information may be used, making sure to attribute claims and giving due weight.

Storm effects are typically referenced with a wide array of published sources. These may include news organizations, risk assessment organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), government agencies, and impact databases. So long as they are reliable sources, they can be used as references for tropical cyclone impacts. Note that figures from early impact reports, often disseminated by the first NGO situation reports and news reports, may quickly be outdated in light of newer information. When sourcing damage totals or casualty figures, use the most recent value from a reliable source, as these values tend to be more stable and use more up-to-date information. If such figures are disputed by other reliable sources, this should be noted in the article, making sure to attribute claims and giving due weight. Routine calculations of damage and casualty figures (for instance, adding casualties from different countries) are acceptable as long as they arise from reliable sources.

Latest WikiProject Alerts

The following are the latest article developments as updated by AAlertBot, as of the publishing of this issue. Due to the bot workings, some of these updates may seem out of place; nonetheless, they are included here.

Article alerts

Your GA nomination of 1944 Jamaica hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1944 Jamaica hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 14:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1944 Jamaica hurricane

The article 1944 Jamaica hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1944 Jamaica hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane has been completed.

I did attempt to tighten up wording and flow, but there is really no way I can think of to write a heavily factual article without it being somewhat "list like". The facts you've included are relevant/interesting.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916 Texas hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1916 Texas hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wyatt2049 -- Wyatt2049 (talk) 00:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916 Texas hurricane

The article 1916 Texas hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1916 Texas hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wyatt2049 -- Wyatt2049 (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1915 Galveston hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1915 Galveston hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 02:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1915 Galveston hurricane

The article 1915 Galveston hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1915 Galveston hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Alicia

Could you finish your thoughts in your edit to Hurricane Alicia? In particular I noticed this:

"Several aircraft at the Texas Gulf Coast Regional Airport in Freeport, Texas; ..."

Perhaps upon reviewing your change you might spot other unfinished business? Shenme (talk) 04:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyclone Tino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

hurricanes

Thank you for quality articles about U.S. hurricanes such as Hurricane Hattie, 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane and List of Texas hurricanes (1980–present), and a countless flow of Good articles, for colaboration, for list of tallest buildings in Austin, for "the world is yours", - Texas Longhorns fan, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2357 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane, introduced: "Between 1944 and 1950, Cuba and Florida would experience an onslaught of 12 hurricane landfalls atop several tropical storms, characterizing one of the region's most active periods on record. The 1944 Cuba–Florida hurricane marked the start of this destructive sequence and dealt a heavy blow on its twelve-day trek from the western Caribbean to Greenland. Unfortunately, records on the storm's impacts in Cuba remain incomplete due to a lack of rural accounts, and the death toll in current literature retains the rough initial estimates of 300. Its large wind field crippled Florida's citrus industry—blankets of orange beneath barren canopies were a common sight across the storm-torn state."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Audrey

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Audrey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 04:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Audrey

The article Hurricane Audrey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Audrey for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 12george1 -- 12george1 (talk) 04:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1916 Virgin Islands hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916 Pensacola hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1916 Pensacola hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916 Pensacola hurricane

The article 1916 Pensacola hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1916 Pensacola hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916 Virgin Islands hurricane

The article 1916 Virgin Islands hurricane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1916 Virgin Islands hurricane for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your hard work

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thank you for continual nominations of exceptionally well-crafted tropical cyclone articles. Many of the articles you have written about tell the history of a storm that otherwise would not be known. I for one have enjoyed reviewing these and learning about the storms of the past. Noah^Talk 19:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1916 Pensacola hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cyclone Harold

On 7 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Harold, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1929 Bahamas hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1929 Bahamas hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1929 Bahamas hurricane

The article 1929 Bahamas hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1929 Bahamas hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1932 San Ciprian hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Juliancolton -- Juliancolton (talk) 03:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1937 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1937 Atlantic hurricane season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Juliancolton -- Juliancolton (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Atlantic hurricane season

The article 1937 Atlantic hurricane season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1937 Atlantic hurricane season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Juliancolton -- Juliancolton (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1934 Central America hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hurricane warning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tradewind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TFA (June 2020)

This is to let you know that the 1944 Cuba-Florida hurricane article has been scheduled as today's featured article for June 16, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 16, 2020.—Wehwalt (talk) 22:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Hugo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cutter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Texas hurricanes (1900–1949), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabine River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Texas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York, Antibody testing and Stay-at-home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1934 Central America hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1934 Central America hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1934 Central America hurricane

The article 1934 Central America hurricane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1934 Central America hurricane for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1934 Central America hurricane

The article 1934 Central America hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1934 Central America hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 17:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Tilda (1964), Typhoon Pamela (1954)

Would you consider creating these articles? I asked this question because you have a lot of interests when it comes to SCS typhoons, i.e. Typhoon Ruby (1964) and Typhoon Sally (1964). And these articles are borderline GA. Creation of these articles would be helpful. SMB9 9thx my edits 10:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While you may be very busy, I decided to give a barnstar for you here.

	The Special Barnstar
	TBH, you are really unbelievable article creator over the years. I don't know which barnstar is appropriate for you. SMB9 9thx my edits 10:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SMB99thx: Thanks for the barnstar! Indeed I am very, very busy this year due to college. I can say that I took a look at Tilda earlier, and I don't think there's enough information I can put together to create an article. I haven't really had a chance to look at Pamela, but so far I haven't found a whole lot of information via the sources I'm familiar with. Someone with better experience with foreign language sources (HK, Philippines, China), might be able to give a better perspective on whether there's enough for an article there, though. —TheAustinMan^{(Talk ⬩ Edits)} 21:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Amarillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Amarillo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Amarillo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, TheAustinMan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. SMB9 9thx my edits! 03:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Louise–Marge

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Louise–Marge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Louise–Marge

The article Typhoon Louise–Marge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Typhoon Louise–Marge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Louise–Marge

The article Typhoon Louise–Marge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Louise–Marge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricane Noah -- Hurricane Noah (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating Typhoon Dot (1964) for GA.

Hello, TheAustinMan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. SMB9 9thx my edits! 13:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I redirected Typhoon Winnie (1964) for GA, I just realized that you're building up 1964 Pacific typhoon season GT. As such, when Typhoon Ruby became a GA I'm nominating Typhoon Dot (1964) for GA. When I'm finished with this GA, I'm also going to nominate November 1964 Vietnam floods next, and probably culminating in nomination of 1964 PTS article for GA. SMB9 9thx my edits! 12:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SMB99thx: Please do not nominate those articles for GA. Dot and the November 1964 floods do not yet feature Chinese or Vietnamese language sources, and a perusal of those areas is required before suitably nominating those articles for GA. While I appreciate the sentiment, I encourage you to pursue content creation and add new content to articles instead of nominating articles that you haven't spent significant work on. Feel free to pitch in when those articles are nominated, though. —TheAustinMan^{(Talk ⬩ Edits)} 16:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why. I have a work to do on Tropical Storm Brendan (1991) (for which I have some Chinese sources to work on), Cyclone Owen (redo effects section), Cyclone Ava, and of course, Effects of Hurricane Dorian in the Carolinas which I have significant role in leading to the publishing of that article. SMB9 9thx my edits! 23:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Ruby (1964)

The article Typhoon Ruby (1964) you wrote has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Ruby (1964) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Destroyeraa -- Destroyeraa (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Big goals

Hello TheAustinMan: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invite!

Please accept this invitation to join WikiProject Weather's Non-tropical storms task force (WPNTS), a task force dedicated to improving all articles associated with extratropical cyclones on Wikipedia. WPNTS hosts a number of Wikipedia's highly-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming winter season (for whichever hemisphere happens to be in its climatological winter). Simply click here and add your name to the list to accept!

HurricaneCovid _(contribs) 02:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for 1916 Texas hurricane, introduced: "The 1910s were not a kind decade to the South Texas coast. Four hurricanes made landfall along the same 18-mile (30 km) section of coast (all in Kenedy County, Texas). The 1916 Texas hurricane tells the tale of the strongest among this onslaught—a quickly moving Category 4 hurricane that dealt a heavy blow to the region, as well as to Jamaica three days earlier."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak

The article 1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 23:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ToC2002Pacifichurricaneseason

Template:ToC2002Pacifichurricaneseason has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 04:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1916 Texas hurricane

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 23, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 23, 2021. Congratulations for your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations \| January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HURDAT reanalysis

Template:HURDAT reanalysis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Cyclone

Hey, would you have any time this summer to help with Tropical cyclone? I am getting ready to work on the structure section, but there is just so much that needs to be done with this article that it's overwhelming for one person. A decent bit of work has been accomplished since the FAR, but it feels like a drop in the bucket. Noah^Talk 00:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: I'm not sure if I'll have much time this summer to help. It may be useful to get someone with international expertise on the subject to provide a more holistic, global view of tropical cyclones; perhaps someone like Jason Rees (talk · contribs). Is there a particular list of what needs to be done with the article to bring it up to speed? I'm not familiar with what's been done since the FAR. —TheAustinMan^{(Talk ⬩ Edits)} 01:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a list of items on the talkpage. Preparations has a mostly complete list of what needs mentioned. It, structure, and response make up the bulk of the work required. here is what the page looked like near the end of the FAR. I would say the bulk of my edits thus far can be summarized as completing most of the intensity subsection, completing the impacts subsection, removing notable tropical cyclones (I have discussed some record setting storms to a lesser degree throughout the article instead to reduce the prior bloated coverage), and removing tropical cyclones in pop culture. There's a lot of coverage that's simply missing for various topics, so this article is bound to only grow from its current size. If we can knockout preps, response, and structure, that will be most of the work. I have asked Hink and JR for help already, but it seems they have been busy for months with real life. Noah^Talk 02:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Comet Kohoutek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Comet Kohoutek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Comet Kohoutek

The article Comet Kohoutek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Comet Kohoutek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CFB Last Meeting

Template:CFB Last Meeting has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Comet Kohoutek

On 21 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Comet Kohoutek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kohoutek (pictured) was the first comet to be proven a dirty snowball? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Comet Kohoutek. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Comet Kohoutek), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 03:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing TheAustinMan a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Your GA nomination of 1931 Valentine earthquake

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1931 Valentine earthquake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1931 Valentine earthquake

The article 1931 Valentine earthquake you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1931 Valentine earthquake and Talk:1931 Valentine earthquake/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 04:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bastrop

Hi TheAustinMan. Thanks for nominating the Bastrop County Complex Fire to GA. I've been working on Bastrop State Park and eventually will promote to GA. Once I'm done digging through archives and completing the article, I'll kindly ping you to take a second look if you can. I also worked on Crocheron–McDowall House and it is currently in GOCE; I will nominate it to GA once it gets a good copyedit. Happy to help with any Bastrop-related articles. Cheers. MX (✉ • ✎) 17:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1931 Valentine earthquake

On 7 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1931 Valentine earthquake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1931 Valentine earthquake was the strongest earthquake in recorded history to hit Texas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1931 Valentine earthquake. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1931 Valentine earthquake), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

AfC notification: Draft:Hurricane Rita evacuation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hurricane Rita evacuation. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Rita evacuation has been accepted

Hurricane Rita evacuation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bastrop County Complex Fire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bastrop County Complex Fire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bastrop County Complex Fire

The article Bastrop County Complex Fire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bastrop County Complex Fire and Talk:Bastrop County Complex Fire/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bastrop County Complex Fire

The article Bastrop County Complex Fire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bastrop County Complex Fire for comments about the article, and Talk:Bastrop County Complex Fire/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1922 Austin twin tornadoes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1922 Austin twin tornadoes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1922 Austin twin tornadoes

The article 1922 Austin twin tornadoes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1922 Austin twin tornadoes and Talk:1922 Austin twin tornadoes/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1922 Austin twin tornadoes

The article 1922 Austin twin tornadoes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1922 Austin twin tornadoes for comments about the article, and Talk:1922 Austin twin tornadoes/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tutorial

Can you show me or do you have a tutorial to make a graphic like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2018_North_American_blizzard#/media/File:January_2018_North_American_blizzard_watches_and_warnings.png Subariba (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]