User talk:Thehistorianisaac

Welcome!

Hi Thehistorianisaac! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleinpecan (talk) 00:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Thehistorianisaac (talk) 04:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References required

Wikipedia requires that references be included at the same time as facts are added. Your edits will continue to be reverted if you do not include references. David notMD (talk) 10:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I don't know how to add them Thehistorianisaac (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read Help:Referencing for beginners, especially RefToolbar sction. Also, I recommend practicing making references in your Sandbox, and only when complete and correct, moving to an article. David notMD (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will not contest your reverts of my removals of content, but in the future, if you add content, add references at the same time. Your user-page statement "Hi everyone! I am interested in history and know a lot of this subject, but i have a bad habit that i never add citations(my facts are usually correct but i never remember to add citations)." is not an excuse for not adding references. David notMD (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but some parts i am only adding stuff that should have been there and is covered late on Thehistorianisaac (talk) 08:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 16:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Thehistorianisaac (talk) 16:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Wizard Digital, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages M24, P90 and SVD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited July 2009 Ürümqi riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uyghur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what is this? Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of HMCS Regina (K234)

The article HMCS Regina (K234) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HMCS Regina (K234) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i understand now. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, I have reverted your nomination of USS North Carolina (BB-55) for FA. It's pretty bad form to nominate articles for reviews if you haven't edited them previously, or even bothered to discuss it with the people who wrote the articles. If you had, I'd have told you that the sourcing on that article is not what it needs to be for FA. You should really only nominate articles for review if you have edited them significantly, or have at least opened a discussion on the talk page so those who wrote the article can advise you whether the article is ready or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joranger Church

I don't know why you placed an ad-tag on the article for a 350-year old church, but I removed it. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a bit biased at the time i read it, maybe it is now improved. Thanks Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plant-stub

Please refrain from applying the Template:Plant-stub to any articles going forward, as you did on Borrichia arborescens. The plant stub category tree is quite deep, with Borrichia arborescens being a member of Category:Heliantheae stubs, itself a member of Category:Asteroideae stubs, which is a member of Category:Asteraceae stubs which is a member of Category:Asterales stubs, which is a member of Category:Asterid stubs, which is a member of Category:Eudicot stubs, which is a member of Category:Angiosperm stubs which finally arrives at Category:Plant stubs. Please inquire at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants if you need assistance in this matter. Abductive (reasoning) 02:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 2023 visit by Joe Biden to Ukraine. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. This issue is currently the topic of ongoing discussions. Please do not remove the notability tag until those conversations are resolved. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how the template works. See Template:Notability#Removing this tag. Prolog (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did i nominate? Thehistorianisaac (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese destroyer Nanchang (101), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yu-7.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

done. fixed it Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

RT-2PM Topol

added links pointing to Topol and Poplar

R-12 Dvina

added a link pointing to Dvina

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RT-2PM Topol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Topol and Poplar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

ARA Santa Fe (S-21)

added a link pointing to Santa Fe

Brazilian submarine Tonelero (S21)

added a link pointing to Tonelero

HMS Farnborough

added a link pointing to Farnborough

HMS Raglan

added a link pointing to Raglan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USNS Catawba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catawba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xi'an Y-20, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunpeng.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for contributing to the article YJ-12. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Ironically i found that source via another wikipedia article so i thought that website was considered reliable on wikipedia Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commando units?

Hi, regarding this edit, do all of those sources list those units specifically as being "commando" units? If they're just generally recognized as SOF but not specifically identified as being commandos, they should not be included on that page. Additionally, some of those sources appear to be questionably reliable -- notably the Bili bili video link appears to fail WP:RS. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 05:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just got the units and sources from the PLASOF article, as previously there was one of the listed units which was a PLAGF special forces unit and I just merely used the criteria that all PLAGF spec ops units are commando units; however on the PLANMC 7th marine brigade and airborne corps special forces brigade I also question whether they are a commando unit and i just purely added links to them(as they were listed there prior). Thehistorianisaac (talk) 05:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not all PLAGF special operations units are commando units. If we do not have a source claiming they are, we cannot include them in this list. Until we can adequately investigate whether there are reliable sources making this claim, I'm going to revert your edit as it constitutes synthesis. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with that... However previous version was not particularly good either, with none of the constituting as commando units Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All three of the remaining units (Jiaolong, Thor, and Snow Leopard) were cited by this source specifically as being commando units and have been for many months now. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

7th Marine Brigade/Jiaolong is a bit more similar to Navy SEALS while Airborne corps special force brigade/Thor/Thunder gods are more of a 45th spetsnaz brigade.

Snow Leopard has a role similar to the GIGN and Russian National Guard spetsnaz;

i would not consider these "commando units", especially due to the fact that the 7th marine brigade was deployed to the gulf of aden to fight pirates. However I will not dispute this too much as after all i'm not the biggest expert on military terminology and english wikipedia is sort of messy when it comes to the PLA Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is why it doesn't matter what we personally consider; it matters what reliable sources say. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agreed. Definition of "commando unit" also differs a lot, some people say it is any elite infantry unit and some say it is light infantry(however either way snow leopard commando unit is a gendarme SWAT unit like the GIGN and not really conventional infantry) Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Meiswikepiediaeditor (talk) 13:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Thehistorianisaac (talk) 14:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7th Marine Brigade (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:7th Marine Brigade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thehistorianisaac! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:7th Marine Brigade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7th Marine Brigade. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:7th Marine Brigade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7th Marine Brigade. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Feeglgeef (talk) 02:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I almost always apply the assume good faith policy however in this case I really doubt good faith can be applied, as the edit summaries are openly stating that they are trying to push an agenda. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you reflexively revert my constructive edits

Hello please do not show prejudice towards me simply because I am an IP user. The edit you reverted was necessary to undue the damage done by wikiuser4020 who has been spamming citations from a few cherrypicked sources to support their fringe Pov towards an afrocentrist interpretation of Egypt thus lending undue weight my edits were necessary to maintain the integrity of this encyclopedia if you will look at their editing history you will see a clear example of Pov pushing. Please undo your reversion. 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:B145:B6D7:4C46:A321 (talk) 02:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not showing prejudice towards you even though you are an IP user, I was randomly scrolling through random changes and decided to make sure it was not vandalism
Other editors have pointed out the sources are reliable, and your edit summary is just, frankly, continous ranting about "fringe POVs".
I will not undo my revision since I did nothing wrong. If you want contact an admin if you still insist that you are correct, but I am simply just doing my job at preventing vandalism

Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources_and_undue_weight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:B145:B6D7:4C46:A321 (talk) 03:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_cannot_claim_the_Earth_is_not_flat 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:B145:B6D7:4C46:A321 (talk) 03:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civil_POV_pushing 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:B145:B6D7:4C46:A321 (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listen: I am not an expert on this subject but I can safely claim your edits count as disruptive editing, as they are tentitious(from reading your contributions, tonnes of your similar edits have been reverted already), are targeted towards another user and are overall disruptive. If you think some of the content is biased consult wikiproject ancient egypt, but absolutely do not delete huge parts of an article without consensus. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:B145:B6D7:4C46:A321 (talk) 03:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would consider your edits tendentious. I don't think they are from a neutral point of view, and are targeted towards an user.

Also to be honest don't rant at me, go consult users that are experts on this subject if you think that editor's edits are biased. I am only here to enforce policies. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I AM an expert in this field! I am defending the neutrality of this encyclopedia from an obviously tendentious editor if you can’t tell that than you are not qualified to edit articles on this subject leave it to experts such as myself 2600:1007:B0B7:9AFB:9941:DCC2:9237:FEFC (talk) 05:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest

Go on wikiproject ancient egypt if you think I am wrong. Don't rant on here. I am only here to stop disruptive edits, which obviously your edits count as disruptive. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]