user talk:theleekycauldron

This talk page is archived.
To browse the archives, press "Show" and select the month of posts you want to view.

2020 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2021 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2022 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2023 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2024 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: CopperyMarrow15)

September music

Thank you for good advice! I would next time use the term "review" but keep hoping no next time of a woman being overlooked will happen. - Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About GalliumBot's talk page updates

Hey leeky, I noticed that for this DYK nomination, GalliumBot did not update the talk page when the hook was adjusted in the prep area with this edit. Might be something to take a look at! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, TechnoSquirrel69! GalliumBot is currently not running the darn protocol; it's down for maintenance indefinitely. Sorry, but I'm pretty touch-and-go with actually making my scripts work, so I have no idea when it'll be back up. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I appreciate the update! May the duck bring you good fortune. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2003:EE:9F19:AD00:D630:5342:7A70:5621 , 87.171.174.211 and 2003:EE:9F19:AD00:E338:4AA8:E17B:CC84

Hi Thellekycauldron, pls help to block sock /meat sock IP addresses above which they are "mass" vandalising German political articles where they were blocked 4 times today by Oshwah already. Thank you Cassiopeia talk 06:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice when promoting hooks

When I open the PSHAW page, every time, it gives me a pop-up that it looks like I edited the nom page, even if I never edited that and/or the article. I think the notice should only appear if the promoter has made at least one edit to the relevant pages. JuniperChill (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuniperChill: thanks for the note! should be fixed now? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you for the fix leek! I also note that I was the third user, and first non-nom who commented/supported the RfA. It was even more so when two of my favourite users was nominating (you can see that I had a chat with both users before). I even managed to write more than a sentence to become one of the first! Good thing I refreshed my watchlist. JuniperChill (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuniperChill: ooh, quick on the draw! I've seen RfAs (own included?) where people are edit conflicting each other in the support section, it's always fun for candidates when that happens :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 11:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was lucky considering that the next comment was simply a signature and that it happened 1 min later. I think I had an edit conflict when voting on an RfA before, but I never did on this one. JuniperChill (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generic middle-east topics template

I really don't know why you left a generic middle-east topics template on my talk page, when I've been editing middle-east related Wikipedia articles off and on for upwards of 15 years. Furthermore, Jewish Palestinian Aramaic is NOT an article related to the Arab-Israeli conflict (as your use of the template falsely claims) -- that language died out about a thousand years ago, and the use of "Palestinian" as a scholarly term there has nothing to do with modern politics. The real problem is that the article has a tendency to attract the attention of cranks. I really don't need your advice in dealing with linguistic cranks on the topic of ancient Aramaic languages, but thanks anyway... AnonMoos (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]