User talk:TridentMan123

Welcome!

Hello, TridentMan123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Very fake news, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Classicwiki (talk) (always ping me) 19:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Very fake news

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Very fake news, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Classicwiki (talk) (always ping me) 19:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History-merge query

What page do you want to be history-merged into page Seth Frankoff? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John E. Carroll

Thanks for creating this. Not all mayors are notable, but one the mayor of a city as large as Seattle should be. All articles need refs though, and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to add them. Can you please go back and work on this? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harry Psutka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Psutka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Psutka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tex Sanner

The article Tex Sanner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject, fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Matthews (baseball)

The article Jim Matthews (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject, fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rod Belcher

The article Rod Belcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject, fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Matthews (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Matthews (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Matthews (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rod Belcher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rod Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tex Sanner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tex Sanner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tex Sanner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryosuke Fukamachi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryosuke Fukamachi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryosuke Fukamachi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Jim Matthews (baseball)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jim Matthews (baseball), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Jim_Matthews, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jim Matthews (baseball) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jim Matthews (baseball), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jim Matthews (baseball). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Jim Matthews (baseball) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jim Matthews (baseball) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Rlendog (talk) 15:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of János Volner

The article János Volner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dušan Šinigoj

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Dušan Šinigoj!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Sinigoj is clearly notable, but this page is liable to ber deleted as an unsourced WP:BLP, which would be a shame. You can find sources quickly by looking here: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Du%C5%A1an_%C5%A0inigoj

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making short, unsourced biographies

Please will you cease creating very short, unreferenced pages about living people? (see here) This goes against Wikipedia's policies. If you can't be bothered to find references and make even a short stub that's worth reading and is verifiable, it's not worth doing at all. These unsourced WP:BLPs are simply going to be deleted, and I see no reason why other editors should trail after you making good your failure too create even a basic, sourced article. These people do look to be notable to me, so it would be a shame for them to go. Why not create one draft article first, get it up to standard, and then move it into mainspace before working on another. I appreciate you want to contribute here, and that's great. But this isn't the way to go about doing that. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. I've moved your article to Draft:Shir Ahmad for you to work on. Some of your articles could get deleted altogether unless you take the above advice. Deb (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you what would happen if you continue in this vein. Please observe the guidelines. Deb (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lyndell Simpson

The article Lyndell Simpson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Lyndell Simpson, without adding a reliable source. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If this was a mistake, don't worry, it has been replaced. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jožef Pogačnik

Hi, I'm Boleyn. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Jožef Pogačnik!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Shir Giyan

Hi, I'm Boleyn. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Shir Giyan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janko Smole

Hello, TridentMan123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Janko Smole, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Janko Smole to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Xevus11 (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this, not actually living. Xevus11 (talk) 19:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you please respond to my previous messages? Articles need sources - see WP:V - and the WP:BURDEN is on you to add them. If you are unsure how to do so, see Help:Referencing for beginners or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been contacted numerous times on this issue by different editors, but have continued creating unreferenced articles. Please see WP:V and WP:BURDEN. You have also been ignoring messages from other editors - please be aware that it is mandatory to respond when other editors raise concerns, per the policies WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond. Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jean-Francis Treffel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jean-Francis Treffel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:E819:CABA:DE75:B335 (talk) 01:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Maliz E. Beams

Hi, I'm JamesG5. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Maliz E. Beams!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Only one reliable news source is cited, the other sources are a gossip page & a business blog of questionable reliability. Article is very short and not well categorized. Notability is not firmly established.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maliz E. Beams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maliz E. Beams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maliz E. Beams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Donovan Ebanks

Hi, I'm Boleyn. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Donovan Ebanks!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in August 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Myers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Herman Phleger

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. TridentMan123, thanks for creating Herman Phleger!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Obituries are not enough to show notability. Please add more sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dom from Paris (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Southgate (Chief of Protocol) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Southgate (Chief of Protocol), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Nelson Hand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lloyd Nelson Hand, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Abell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tyler Abell, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chiefs of protocol

Hi you have recently created a lot of articles on chiefs of protocol. Please read the notability criteria for people WP:NPEOPLE as most do not have the required coverage in sources to pass the notability criteria. There is no inherant notabilty in being chief of protocol so you should only be creating the articles about those that have sufficient coverage to pass. Please note that just obituries are not enough to show notability in general. I shall move those that only have primary coverage and no claims to meeting specific criteria notabilty to draft space to allow you time to source these people. --Dom from Paris (talk) 10:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Mel French moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mary Mel French, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Henick moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jonathan Henick, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Southgate (Chief of Protocol) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Southgate (Chief of Protocol), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TridentMan123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Giffen Weinmann

Thanks for creating John Giffen Weinmann.

A New Page Patroller Newslinger just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Hi TridentMan123, and thanks for contributing this article to Wikipedia! NNDB is considered a questionable source (see past discussions), so please consider replacing that reference with a more reliable source. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Newslinger talk 19:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tyler Abell

Thanks for creating Tyler Abell.

A New Page Patroller Doomsdayer520 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Tyler Abell, but I strongly recommend finding more information on his career and achievements to fill out the article. See the guidelines at WP:BLPRS and WP:NPOLITICIAN for pointers. Good luck.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric H. Hager

Hello, TridentMan123,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Eric H. Hager, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert: Mark Dice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 15:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

make a suggestion

I have asked for you (or anyone else) to actually make a suggested edit on the talk page for us to discus. Just repeating the same question over and over again is not going to convince anyone and is loosing you any sympathy you might have had with experienced editors. You are now getting into the area of tendentious editing.Slatersteven (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you take head of the block imposed on Mr Dice and actually start to make constructive suggestions.Slatersteven (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And comments like this [[1]] are doing you no favours.Slatersteven (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

To enforce an arbitration decision and for trolling [2], you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 15:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Said Abeid moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Said Abeid, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 07:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jonathan Henick

Hello, TridentMan123,

Thanks for creating Jonathan Henick! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Jonathan Henick. I strongly recommend more content beyond his basic presence in his political position. If possible, see if any of his actions have made the news or generated public discussion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:50, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Manderson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Franz Manderson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Bayle (prefect) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pierre Bayle (prefect), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Southgate (Chief of Protocol)

Hello, TridentMan123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Southgate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Franz Manderson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Franz Manderson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pierre Bayle (prefect) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pierre Bayle (prefect), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin

Hello, TridentMan123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pengiran Dipa Negara Laila Diraja Pengiran Abdul Mumin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pierre Bayle (prefect)

Hello, TridentMan123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pierre Bayle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eric Swalwell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bryce Fehmel

The article Bryce Fehmel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBASE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Henick

The article Jonathan Henick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. Fails WP:GNG and WO:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bryce Fehmel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryce Fehmel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Fehmel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Henick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Henick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Henick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colton Eastman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colton Eastman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colton Eastman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cesar Bernhardt

Hello, TridentMan123

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sadads, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Cesar Bernhardt, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Cesar Bernhardt

Hello TridentMan123, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Cesar Bernhardt, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cesar Bernhardt (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 00:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James P. Covey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James P. Covey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James P. Covey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]