User talk:Velthorian

Welcome!

Hello, Maheep Singh24! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Burj Khalifa, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Please review WP:OVERLINKING - FlightTime (open channel) 17:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing I just started learning how to edit on Wikipedia. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime I just noticed that you have removed too much linkings on Burj Khalifa ,so I am linking some Maheep Singh24 (talk) 05:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from SSSB

Hello, Velthorian. You have new messages at Talk:Darren Moore/GA1.
Message added 11:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SSSB (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message to Velthorian

I am concerned with your GA-related activity: in the time since you totally botched this GA review with a quick fail on the 23rd, you've passed another with absolutely no commentary of substance, started another review, and yourself made a totally baffling nomination of Buddhism, which itself makes me feel you are inadequately familiar to be reviewing nominations at such a pace. I am totally unconvinced you are putting in the effort to actually ensure articles meet the criteria, and it doesn't serve either the nominator or readers. Please slow down. Remsense ‥ 论 09:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense,I made a mistake in first but not in my second review. I accept that Buddhism can't be a GA. if you don't trust me, you can review UNICEF club again. Being an introvert, I just can't entirely explain my point of view. Velthorion (Alarm!) 09:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, I do not know whether you made a mistake in your second review, because you did not write anything of substance during it. You need to be much more deliberate in your reviews; what you are presently doing is totally unhelpful. Remsense ‥ 论 09:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll try to be as explaining as possible Velthorion (Alarm!) 09:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"If you don't trust me, re-review it yourself" is an answer you should never have to make, since we should be able to see the process for ourselves. Remsense ‥ 论 09:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Velthorian, just to repeat what I said on Talk:Darren Moore/GA1 (should have pinged you, as maybe you didn't get the notification), perhaps you are misunderstanding how GAN reviews work? I suggest reading WP:GAN#I and asking for help. You are being unintentionally disruptive with your GAN "reviews", even though you are trying to help. I have notified the talk page for the GAN reviews too, to deal with the incorrectly reviewed GANs. Someone there would probably reach out to help you, I think. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]