User talk:Wally Tharg

Re: Casualties or losses?

OK, noted; I'll make the heading more inclusive. Kirill 16:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Wally Tharg?

Who is Wally Tharg? I really need to know. Ickenham 1979

I don't know either. I guess from your sign-off that you were at Brunel at the same time as I ... had digs in Ickenham as well! Wally was always one of the joke candidates in union elections. (I hasten to add I didn't produce the posters, but they did make me laugh.) But when it came to choosing a nom de wiki a small bunch of neurons fired, and so it was. --Wally Tharg (talk) 10:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't at Brunel, but I did see a band play at my school in Ickenham 1979. They had "Vote Tharg" posters, and a song with a chorus of something like "Who'll vote for Wally Tharg". They were a bit Gang Of Four and a bit Rude Boy, but probably nobody. Is it all just from 2000AD?

I suspect the surname is from that series, but I assumed the posters were a Brunel thing. Maybe the band was based there. I'm sure someone will eventually identify the person who appeared on them. If anyone knows anything more, please post on this page! --Wally Tharg (talk) 08:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Wally Tharg/Bryan perrett has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan perrett, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question from another freediving Wikipedian

Oh my, you just resurrected an fellow Wikipedian who has not been active since 2007. Of course, I would like to help you, and I have tons of scientific material on the subject. I only don't have much time to re-learn how wikipedia works, so I would prefer single clear requests to do something.--Apneist (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I, also, can help you with this. Wiki4Thal (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck and have fun, I will help where I can if requested, and already do a bit of patrolling. I will make a freediving navbox for Portal:Underwater diving. If there are enough articles, we can also have one for freedivers, but lets see how it goes first. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The navbox is now available and on the freediving page. It is not complete. Feel free to edit it until it suits the purpose. If you need help, call. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 10:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, many thanks for adding the freediving navbox – I shall review and add to it. It may be that this plus a small amount of patrolling is all that's needed. The most important thing is that freediving is 'looked after' by some group, and doesn't fall into a grey area between SCUBA, extreme sports, water sports and swimming; all of these groups and projects seem to have an editorial inerest in it. --Wally Tharg (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freediving does need someone to look after it who knows a bit about it. I do a bit of vandalism patrolling and cross referencing within the Underwater diving portal, but dont have the time or knowledge to do anything creative about the actual articles.
A bit of background on categories: We try not to add a category if an article is in a category that is already contained in the other category. As an example, French free-divers is already within the category Free-divers, so the appropriate category for a French freediver is French free-divers only, not both. It took me a while to find this out. Categories can be a bit mysterious until you work them out, and a lot of editors never get around to it. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 19:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly fire

Hello, I read your comments on the "friendly fire" article (which I'd endorse, BTW). You mentioned Karansebes, Bois de Rossignol, and Beauséjour as notorious cases; I found Karansebes but drew a blank with the other two. What were you referring to? Xyl 54 (talk) 00:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your comments. Both these incidents were between French units in 1914. At the Bois de Rossignol (22.8.1914) in the Belgian Ardennes during the Battle of the Frontiers, French colonial artillery bombarded one of their own infantry regiments, killing and wounding about 1000 soldiers. (Percin says 666 killed and 334 wounded, but this seems too 'neat' a figure to be entirely accurate.) At Beauséjour (20.12.1914) in eastern France a similar thing happened to 33 and 38 Colonial Infantry Regiments, again with around 1000 killed and wounded. Both incidents were descrbed by Alexandre Percin in his 1921 book, and (I think) discussed by Shrader. Because of the scale of the casualties they warranted inclusion in Kirke's list of the most damaging friendly fire incidents in history. (The only other known ones to score so highly for fatalities were Karansebes, Cabareta Point, Koivisto, U-333 sinking the Spreewald, and when the German destroyers Z-53 and Z-36 ran onto their own minefield in the Baltic in 1944.)

The problem is that modern incidents receive much more publicity, and are therefore easier for editors to add to the list in the article. Kirke's book has full references to all those I've quoted. However, I'm sure there must be worse ones lurking in the grey areas of Chinese and Russian military history – 'all' we need is some historians who are interested in friendly fire, and who can read Chinese and Russian. --Wally Tharg (talk) 11:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying, and for the information.

I noticed we had a page on Rossignol Wood, but that seems, now, to be about somewhere else. The other thing I found was this, about the August 1914 engagement, but it doesn’t mention a friendly fire incident, as far as I can tell (my French isn’t really up to it)

And, you mentioned Russian military history….I’m sure I read somewhere that Zhukov (at least) insisted on advancing troops staying much closer to a creeping barrage than would be countenanced by Brits or Americans in WWII; this gave a reduction in casualties from enemy fire, at the cost of higher friendly fire casualties. I think I also read that this philosophy has found its way into American military thinking now. Anyway, thanks again.. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan perrett.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 21:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can probably find enough evidence of notability for this article, so give it a go. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 19:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shall do! I think the bar has been raised quite a bit higher for BLPs recently though. My own view is that writing 70+ respected history books and having hundreds of links in other Wiki articles speaks for itself ... --Wally Tharg (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of underwater diving terminology

I have started a new glossary of underwater diving terminology for any terms particular to any form of underwater diving and related matters. Feel free to go add anything that you think might be helpful about freediving. As it is a glossary it is a good place for subjects that are more than just a dictionary definition, and less than an article, though just because something is worthy of an article doesnt mean it shouldnt get an entry in the glossary. Also a good place to explain jargon, slang, regional expressions etc.

You are welcome to try your hand with the definition template formatting in the glossary, or just stack up the items in the pending list on the talk page. Where possible include a suitable description/definition. If it is linked to a referenced WP article, there isn't a need for heavy citation in the glossary, but a reference is useful for what most people would consider obscure terminology. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 18:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peter, shall have a look once I've 'given the treatment' to WW1 in Togoland and the Cameroons. --Wally Tharg (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Apatura iris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gwent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, mea culpa ... but if I thank a 'Bot, will a living breathing human being ever read the message? Actually I've just found out (from Wikipedia) that Gwent is now defunct for the second time, and we’re back to calling it Monmouthshire. This was the area I was attempting to refer to, so no need for a disambiguation. --Wally Tharg (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The College of Richard Collyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – sorted. --Wally Tharg (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Noseclip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – have rectified. I’ve redirected the link to human swimming rather than the sport, as noseclips are more often used by fitness and recreational swimmers. --Wally Tharg (talk) 21:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people with the most children may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| align="center"|'''''<100'''''
Christ of Latter-day Saints living in [[Utah]], he was arrested at 52 for polygamy in 1955.<ref>[http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1906&dat=19551028&id=4lofAAAAIBAJ&sjid=4dgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2130,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – have fixed. --Wally Tharg (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan perrett concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan perrett, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people with the most children, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champlain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – fixed. --Wally Tharg (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of conflicts in Africa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bornu and Baguirmi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DPL Bot, errors fixed. --Wally Tharg (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of conflicts in Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atakora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Bryan perrett

Hello Wally Tharg. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Bryan perrett.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan perrett}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people with the most children may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| align="center"|'''''<100'''''
against family planning in Senegal, claiming that it is his God-given duty to multiply.<ref>[[http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/family-planning-program-in-senegal-drawn-into-conflict-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks – fixed. Wally Tharg (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey is not in Europe

So since my last message was removed for being too "vulgar" and attacking wally tharg. i'll say this as nicely as i can. turkey is not in europe so please get it right. it is definitely! not in southern europe. turkey is in the middle east(asia) or west asia, only 3% is further than west asia but no way is it in europe. you could however say, it is NEAR east europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.74.199.31 (talk) 12:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no offence taken – this was a long time ago. I’m afraid I got a bit irritated with another IP user, and tried to clarify things according to what I thought was correct geographically, without inferring anything politically. Turkey is clearly a ‘grey area’ in this respect, split (like Russia) between the two continents, and with strong links to Europe (e.g. in NATO) but at present outside the EU. We have similar controversies in the British Isles, between political entities and biogeographical ones. --Wally Tharg (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please help define small lepidopteran

Talk:Colias_hyale#.22Small.22_is_an_unhelpful_term_--_there_are_plenty_of_smaller_butterflies Viren (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy editViren (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! --Wally Tharg (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:British cavalry during the First World War

I note that you have added a comment to Talk:British cavalry during the First World War. In the process, you edited one of my comments. Please note that this is very bad form: do not alter other editors comments. Hamish59 (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, assumed it was just a typo. --Wally Tharg (talk) 20:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Hamish59 (talk) 20:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wally Tharg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Fusiliers

Hi - Many thanks for your recent edit. Do you have a page number from Carter's book that can be inserted? Dormskirk (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep ... p.266 ... shall do so shortly! --Wally Tharg (talk) 12:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wally Tharg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]