User talk:Why can't I edit Userpedia?
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 00:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 00:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Samf4u. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my my talk page. Thank you. - Samf4u (talk) 18:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
American Airlines Flight 1420
[edit]Hi Why can't I edit Userpedia?, Thanks for fixing the figures in the infobox. We usually don't include types of injuries in them however. - Samf4u (talk) 14:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]Hi Why can't I edit Userpedia?, Thanks for you contributions to WP. I hope you don't feel as though I'm picking on you by reverting some of your edits. There is lot's to learn here editing, and as you continue the pieces should fall in to place for you. Best of luck, - Samf4u (talk) 23:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lion Air Flight 610. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 20:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Uh, how is that vandalism? I added in true information. There were no injuries and 190 fatalities-it is not like I added in false information in that article. Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry, but how come "190 fatalities (+1 rescue diver)"? In the Passengers and crew section, the article says 189 in total; the infobox says 181 passengers, 8 crew, totaling 189. The infobox also mentions the diver who died in connection with the rescue. By changing just the number (189 to 190) and leaving the rest of the text as it was, you added incorrect information. Also such edit is not a minor one. So it looks like vandalism. A possible solution would be: "Fatalities: 190 (including 1 rescue diver)" but I think the current version is better, as it reflects info in the Passengers and crew section more directly. WikiHannibal (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- I am still not sure if it counts as vandalism-adding in false information does not simply mean that it is vandalism. Also, note than the edit that I made was not intentional. However, I think I can understand more clearly. Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry, but how come "190 fatalities (+1 rescue diver)"? In the Passengers and crew section, the article says 189 in total; the infobox says 181 passengers, 8 crew, totaling 189. The infobox also mentions the diver who died in connection with the rescue. By changing just the number (189 to 190) and leaving the rest of the text as it was, you added incorrect information. Also such edit is not a minor one. So it looks like vandalism. A possible solution would be: "Fatalities: 190 (including 1 rescue diver)" but I think the current version is better, as it reflects info in the Passengers and crew section more directly. WikiHannibal (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Edit for the 1972 Sacramento Canadair Sabre Accident
[edit]I meant to put in an edit summary in there, but my fingers slipped. Anyway, I made the ground casualties separate from the pilot himself. Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of 1998 Capital Taxi Aereo plane crash for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1998 Capital Taxi Aereo plane crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Capital Taxi Aereo plane crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Western Airlines Flight 2605, you may be blocked from editing. WikiHannibal (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Why can't I edit Userpedia?! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 08:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have just provided the source for my edit. However, I think that a warning is a bit too harsh, as I was warned about disruptive editing only once before that edit. Also, I have a ton of helpful contributions. Given that I was reminded about disruptive editing only once or twice, and the fact that it was in intervals (it is not like I made three disruptive edits in a single day, it was spread out over months), may I appeal this warning? Thank you. Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, you do not have to appeal warnings. You had your first warning in March, your second in April, and now your third in June. Given your edit history, I doubt you would be blocked after your potential 4th warning. Each "case" is reviewed indivudually. But that does not mean you should continue to add unsourced information or mark edits as minor when you seem not to understand the difference (for example, here you added the cause of the crash but no burst is mentioned in the article, so it looks like WP:OR and is not, I believe, a minor edit). The number of edits is commendable but, on the other hand, makes mistakes/original research/unsourced addtions harder to spot. Just be more careful and read the policies linked from the warnings (and perhaps some others), or ask for help at the teahouse, for example. WikiHannibal (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not trying to be rude or make you feel bad, but after looking at your talk page, I don't feel so bad about my warnings. It looks like you have gotten just as many warnings (if not more) as I have. Not everyone's perfect here, but we all try to be constructive. :) Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, you do not have to appeal warnings. You had your first warning in March, your second in April, and now your third in June. Given your edit history, I doubt you would be blocked after your potential 4th warning. Each "case" is reviewed indivudually. But that does not mean you should continue to add unsourced information or mark edits as minor when you seem not to understand the difference (for example, here you added the cause of the crash but no burst is mentioned in the article, so it looks like WP:OR and is not, I believe, a minor edit). The number of edits is commendable but, on the other hand, makes mistakes/original research/unsourced addtions harder to spot. Just be more careful and read the policies linked from the warnings (and perhaps some others), or ask for help at the teahouse, for example. WikiHannibal (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Delta Air Lines Flight 157 for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delta Air Lines Flight 157 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 157 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petebutt (talk) 06:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of aircraft structural failures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mojave. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Your draft article, Draft:American Airlines Flight 300
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Airlines Flight 300".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1972 Las Palomas mid air collision
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1972 Las Palomas mid air collision".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Iberia Airlines Flight 1456
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iberia Airlines Flight 1456".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not a problem. The article for that draft has already been published. :) Why can't I edit Userpedia? (talk) 02:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1998 Capital Taxi Aereo Crash
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1998 Capital Taxi Aereo Crash".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513 has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Aeroflot Flight A-513 (January 22)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Your draft article, Draft:Aeroflot Flight A-513
[edit]Hello, Why can't I edit Userpedia?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aeroflot Flight A-513".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)