User talk:XSMan2016

Welcome!

Hello, XSMan2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ayub407^talk 19:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Ayub407. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Three Stooges without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I undid you edit. Please use the talkpage of the article to form a consensus before merging a section of a article Ayub407^talk 19:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Three Stooges to C3 Entertainment. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Pink Panther (2006 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not change sourced text without a proper citation. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Pink Panther (2006 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing, reliable sources

Please stop changing the information in the infobox in The Pink Panther (2006 film). It's sourced to the American Film Institute, which is a reliable source. You replaced this with a citation to the IMDb, which is user-generated content and not reliable. This follows previous disruptive edits you've made to the page. If you continue doing this, you're likely to be blocked for disruption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XSMan2016, in response to your post on my talk page, you are in the wrong if you keep adding IMDb as a reference. Per longstanding widespread community consensus, IMDb is not considered a reliable source because it is user-generated. Exactly what NinjaRobotPirate explained above. Please stop edit-warring with this source and find another source that meets our reliable sourcing guidelines. We don't consider blogs or discussion forums or any user-generated site as sufficient. Content must be supported by reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy, like mainstream newspapers, magazines, books and things of that nature. Any more warring over this matter will be considered disruptive and will be followed by an interruption of your editing privileges. That, however, is completely preventable. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why did you move the |border= parameter to the bottom of the infobox in this edit? It doesn't make any sense to ungroup the image formatting parameters. You wind up with multiple instances of the same parameter. This is not constructive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Pink Panther (2006 film)#Studio and distributor

Hi there, you are invited to participate in the discussion Talk:The Pink Panther (2006 film)#Studio and distributor. Particularly I am concerned that you don't understand our guidelines on reliable sources based on this edit where you replaced IMDb with a site that is probably a mirror/scraper of IMDb's content. As a general rule, only sources that have established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy should be used. I strongly doubt that you could tell me or NinjaRobotPirate anything about the site you used. If not, you probably shouldn't be using it. On the off-chance that you can, you are encouraged to participate in the discussion linked above. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your edit summary here where you say, "From this moment on, we leave it like this. I have spoken." The place for you to speak is on talk pages. If you refuse to do so, then you frustrate the collaborative process. Since Wikipedia is a collaborative process, your lack of discussion is problematic. From my perspective I have seen you assert content using insufficient sources, stonewall change, refuse to participate in discussion, then issue an edict that the content is set in stone because you "have spoken". That's not going to fly here. If discussion is not something you are comfortable with, you'll either have to learn to yield or find a more satisfying solitary hobby. If you continue this sort of non-participation/ownership behavior again, you greatly run the risk of having your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at The Pink Panther (2006 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For this. Either discuss, or drop the stick. NinjaRobotPirate has been more than patient with you. Unilaterally restoring questioned content without providing solid sources or providing a clear explanation is not helpful. And no, I don't consider "I'm doing this now, because the the Columbia Pictures films have been distributed by Columbia Pictures." to be a clear explanation or a solid source. If this continues after your block expires, the blocks will get longer. You are in complete control of how you are treated here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ratatouille (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You were told multiply that tertriary sources do not make wrongs right. As officially denoted in the film credits, it was "produced by Pixar" and "distributed by Buena Vista Pictures Distribution", and alternative facts such as that of a database source (which is unreliable atop) are not accepted. Furthermore, you continously break the WP:COMMONNAME guideline by changing "Pixar" to "Pixar Animation Studios"; there is a reason the article is named that way, and that reason is not to make editors pipe and full-state the name; and also break the WP:NOTBROKEN guideline by overpiping redirects unnecessarily. Since you rejected my, and other editors', statements, but rather threatend us, I must hand you this warning. Lordtobi (✉) 09:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is to let you know that your edit to The Lego Batman Movie, has been reverted. Any information on home media must be put up, after it has been released in such formats. By that time, there should be more information to expand that section, but not before it has been released on DVD and Blu-Ray, per the citations someone put forward.GUtt01 (talk) 21:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TTG Movie Poster 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TTG Movie Poster 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Master poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Master poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trick you.

I think Toy Story 4 is rated G now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.77.132.208 (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still doesn't show it. --XSMan2016 (talk) 00:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were right, it got its G rating. And to think, I thought it was gonna be the first film in the series to receive a PG rating. --XSMan2016 (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Bros. Animation logo 2014.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros. Animation logo 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disney new shorts on Disney+

Is there going to be the new Wreck-It Ralph and Zootopia short films on Disney+?

I don't know. --XSMan2016 (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hynden Walch, July 2018.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hynden Walch, July 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking sourced content

Please do not blank sourced content, as you did in this edit. Wikipedia is written according to what reliable sources say, not what random people on the internet think is true. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But that Verity page was a reliable source. --XSMan2016 (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Movies of 2020s

Family movies of 2020s are going to be rated G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.187.43 (talk) 04:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know? --XSMan2016 (talk) 06:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Films 2020s

Animated and live-action family films of 2020s to be rated G are coming to Netflix and Disney+. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.187.43 (talk) 21:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HOW do you KNOW? --XSMan2016 (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All the new family films of 2020s are going to be rated G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.187.43 (talk) 08:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kid film

The Phineas and Ferb Movie and Sesame Street (2021) are going to be rated G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.187.43 (talk) 08:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't stop, I will report you! --XSMan2016 (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm so sorry. I promised I'll never do that again. Please don't report me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B016:1A75:88AA:DD7:B706:EE11 (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See that you don't.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

I just undid several edits where you reworked a link to a redirect into a piped link. While I understand the instinct, please don't do this; not only does it serve no useful function, it actually interferes in ways. I see that you've been pointed to WP: NOTBROKEN in the past; if you did not review that then, please do so now. --Nat Gertler (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbia logo 2006-2014.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Columbia logo 2006-2014.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowCyclone talk 02:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logopedia is not a reliable source. You need to provide a source that this logo is real. ShadowCyclone talk 02:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe you oughta find these logos rather than me doing these things after waiting so long. XSMan2016 (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's your responsibility for this file, not mine. ShadowCyclone talk 14:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fine, but maybe someone should have checked the talk page for that link I put there in the first place. This is what I get when I spell these things out.

Orphaned non-free image File:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adventures in Wonder Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adventures in Wonder Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventures in Wonder Park. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What diufference does it make? The show will be out next month anyway. XSMan2016 (talk) 04:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:20th Century Fox 2009-2013 logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:20th Century Fox 2009-2013 logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Empty Man (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 09:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Looney Tunes Cartoons poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Looney Tunes Cartoons poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghost Corps Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghost Corps Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Three Little Stooges

Hello, XSMan2016. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Three Little Stooges, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Three Little Stooges

Hello, XSMan2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Three Little Stooges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Locke Cole. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ultra HD Blu-ray, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Locke Cole • t • c 18:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On it. --XSMan2016 (talk) 08:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (2021).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Pictures Home Entertainment (2021).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paramount Pictures (2022).svg

@XSMan2016 Should this 2022 version of the Paramount Pictures logo be added to Wikimedia Commons? Let me know if possible. FireDragonValo (talk) 18:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish, as long as I see it kept on the Paramount Pictures page and 2020-2029 list of Paramount Pictures films. XSMan2016 (talk) 18:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramount Pictures (2022).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramount Pictures (2022).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's being used for the Paramount Pictures article. XSMan2016 (talk) 01:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kitty Softpaws

The article Kitty Softpaws has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 19:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kitty Softpaws

Hello, XSMan2016. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kitty Softpaws, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shrek Forever After, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Robinson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kitty Softpaws

Hello, XSMan2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kitty Softpaws".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:The Patrick Star Game cover art.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:The Patrick Star Game cover art.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]