User talk:XavierGreen

Merger discussion for Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou

An article that you have been involved in editing—Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Maersk Hangzhou

An article that you have been involved in editing—Maersk Hangzhou—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maersk Hangzhou has an RfC

Maersk Hangzhou has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Nomination of Dobley missile strike for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dobley missile strike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dobley missile strike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 00:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation at 2024 United States presidential election

Hi, Please be aware that the article 2024 United States presidential election is subject to WP:1RR per active Arbitration enforcement and you violated it by making more than one reversion in the time period. Raladic (talk) 03:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not violate 1RR. If you look through the edit log, you will see that I reverted two entirely different sections of the article.XavierGreen (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed two different sections, but not due to one of the permissable exemptions, as you made one saying it was undue and the other because you disagree with the consensus, which means both reversions were content related so this means both reversions count and thus you fell afoul of 1RR.

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances) Raladic (talk) 03:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raladic There is no consensus on the page for the change I reverted. However, I've read through the policy again and now see what you are saying. In the 3RR section it states that reversions of multiple different edits count. It does not state that clearly in the 1RR policy that the hatnote links to though. I would suggest clarifying that in the 1RR section of the relevant Wiki:policy page. Another editor already changed back one of my edits. I will not make any more edits to the article for the next 24 hours.XavierGreen (talk) 03:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The exemptions are shared for 3RR and 1RR as they use the same link as you can see at the top of Talk:2024 United States presidential election in the Arbitration Enforcement Action warning.

So yes, basically, just keep it in mind for next time to be cautious on articles that do have active AE enforcements as even two separate reversions, if they are not clearly covered by the exemptions, do count as a technical 1RR violation. Raladic (talk) 03:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cited one paragraph as undue to justify removal of three paragraphs, an entire section encompassing much more than what you specifically cited. I find this improper. soibangla (talk) 03:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not make any more edits to the article for the next 24 hours after you improperly removed a section and it will remain removed to avoid an edit war. You are not making it easy for me to AGF. soibangla (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if we're sure it was a formal declaration of war under Israeli law

Discussion at the Talk Page on the Declaration of War entry. Thanks. Not logged in 2 (talk) 22:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help!

Thank you for providing that citation on the economy being the #1 issue in the 2024 election! I apologize if my edit summary seemed overly rude. Wehpudicabok (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]