User talk:Xyn1

Please refer to the history page to see my "Talk", since all of the discussions have been rectified by now I've cleared them.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Xyn1. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ekabhishek^talk 08:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Journal of Medical Ethics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Journal of Medical Ethics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mental Healthcare

A tag has been placed on Category:Mental Healthcare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redrose64 (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mental Healthcare in India

The article Mental Healthcare in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure WP:OR essay and WP:POV piece, suitable for a blog or media article, but not for Wikipedia. Such references that exist are wholly insufficient. WP:TNT is a valid solution here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 16:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BLP vio

Also, the Indira Sharma article should be about her not about her son. It was not correctly cited, notability is not established, and you used her article to discuss her son. Please slow down and learn the policies and guidelines here-- you are creating a lot of faulty articles and a lot of work for other editors. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. One of the articles which mentions her son also mentions her job at uni. Another article, which received some press attention, also talks about a goof up. It mentions her presidency of IPS. Xyn1 (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice-- then you should have written it that way and cited it that way. Instead, you wrote an article about her son's misdeeds, under her name. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am always on the lookout for taint. I prefer using real wikipedia pages to store info rather than use sandbox. If I came across even more info about her son, I would have created an article. It seems, that after checking out the news coverage her son received, I most-def think he needs his own page. Actually, my editing strategy is to write as much about both persons in that single page, if the primary individual's space devoted becomes much less compared to the 2nd, I opt for creating a new article. Since I am an impulsive and lazy wikipedian, I very slowly come to terms with the notability status of an individual/s. Xyn1 (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be helpful if you would be on the lookout for your own understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also [articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-02-27/ahmedabad/28123006_1_utsav-sharma-indira-sharma-ruchika-molestation-case this] ref even reports that she wants to be associated with her son. She is willing to enter into the spotlight to help her son. Xyn1 (talk) 02:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indira Sharma

The article Indira Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough sources to write a longer than 1-sentence, non-coatrack, biographical article that complies with wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:India tv logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:India tv logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antara (Mental Hopital) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antara (Mental Hopital), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antara (Mental Hopital)

Hello Xyn1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Antara (Mental Hopital)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antara (Mental Hopital)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charnock Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charnock Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charnock Hospital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charnock Hospital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charnock Hospital until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 23:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mental Health in the United Kingdom

Template:Mental Health in the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Banyan (NGO) Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Banyan (NGO) Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:India Uncut HomePage Screenshot.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:India Uncut HomePage Screenshot.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Xyn1/Substance dependence

Hello, Xyn1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Substance dependence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]