Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 NECBL All-Star Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2006 NECBL All-Star Game

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be nice if the nominator would say more about why this article should be deleted than "WP:GNG".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:12, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:29, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, not sufficient for a standalone article. Wizardman 22:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge the result into a table on New England Collegiate Baseball League - insufficient coverage in independent, reliable sources for a standalone article. Also, don't we have some way of making mass nominations on a single page, or is that disallowed? —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.