Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract house

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete ɑʀкʏɑɴ 20:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract house

Protologism. May be too new to be verifiable. Alksub 07:21, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for WP:NEO, WP:CITE, no argument or evidence of notability, and unless I'm guessing wrong, it's really just an advert for some group or individual called "Watchmen" that doesn't have its own wikipedia article (and is apparently no relation to the 90s Canadian group as far as I can see). Best guess: garage band is thinking to use wikipedia to get out the word and maybe someday they'll get a gig and move out of their parents' basement. Sorry if that's rude, but that's the impression this article gives. -Markeer 16:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep These people are kind of nutty with their constant genre creation, (deep acid house, anyone?) but there are references online. MarkinBoston 16:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless refs that put it above WP:NEO are found Corpx 18:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, the article creator just blanked both the article and it's talk page, so... -Markeer 21:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ♫ Cricket02 18:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There aren't even any citations. Salvatore22 01:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.