Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent MJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Michael Jackson. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agent MJ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to call for a page of its own. Content already exists at Michael Jackson. Character was called Agent M and not MJ in Men in Black II Sesamevoila (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Michael Jackson. Characters appearing in 1 or 2 films are rarely notable, no matter who plays them, and this character doesn't seem to have the notability or material for a detailed article. I'm not exactly sure on the redirect target; you could redirect to Men in Black II or Michael Jackson videography if you prefer. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Michael Jackson - This brief article says nothing that can't easily be said in the main article. Does not require a stand-alone. -- WikHead (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. And Redirect to the Jackson article. Neither "Agent MJ" as portrayed by Michael Jackson in Miss Cast Away and the Island Girls nor "Agent M" as portrayed by Jackson in Men in Black II have enough individual notability for stand alone articles. BUT, these roles do have the verifiability to be mentioned in the Jacskon article and in the two film articles. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.