Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambiaty
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphim♥Whipp 17:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ambiaty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I originally tagged this for speed deletion as an advertisement, but the user asked for it to stay and said they planned to add good references. I removed the speedy and let it stay. However, it's remained as-is; an ad for a plant extract with no assertion of notability. Looks like a press release at best, blatant googlerank-spam at worst. Fribbler (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with nominator here. Basically like a wikified advertisement/press release with almost every "source" to a single first party address. A lot is hard to understand for anyone unfamiliar with the subject. Rehevkor ✉ 00:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, spamvertisement. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I'd even say to just speedy the damn thing, considering the section on Sustainable Harvesting- all it's doing is talking about how great "Bayer Sante Familiale – Division Serdex" is. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 05:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-speedy Delete Nothing on Google News regarding this product. Regular Google hits are all sales, advertising "reviews" and/or self-published, nothing on which to base an article per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Speedy deleting this would provide no protection against recreation, which is quite common with advertising articles. There is no deadline. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 22:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.