Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 14:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anope

Page has no verifiable, notable sources, and has been tagged as such since May 2008 without further amendment Thor Malmjursson (talk) 22:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This afd has been assisted for placement on behalf of User:Braindigitalis by myself, Iceflow. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 22:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem to have been covered in any reliable sources. (And I think four stub tags is a record for the most on one article.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a few external links, changed the second person text to third person, and Anope is notable because it is a frequently used IRC service package for IRC networks. Yamakiri ^T_C § 08-2-2008 • 22:42:14
Delete Not notable outside a small interest range (IRC administrators), and furthermore the project is dead upstream (no releases since January, and that was only a security fix.) --nenolod (talk) (edits) 00:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS Artene50 (talk) 00:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as insufficiently notable. No evidence this project has been the subject of coverage by multiple, reliable, third-party published sources. — Satori Son 17:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above South-East7™^Talk/_Contribs 13:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.196.6 (talk) 18:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]