Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arihant follow-on submarine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arihant follow-on submarine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable sources to support the claim of follow-on submarines of "Arihant class" i.e., new class. The sources does not mention anything about follow on class of Arihant (It simply mentions 'follow on submarines of INS arihant' i.e., INS Aridhaman, ATV-3 and ATV-4). Hence the article might simply be a hoax.. Proposing DELETION. Regards JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 18:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- For now due to the lack of multiple or any reference which points to a follow on class of Arihant as of may 2015, the article should be deleted. a discussion was open on 21 March 2015 regarding Number of ships in Arihant class please check this Talk:Arihant-class submarine page and post your comments also.Nicky mathew (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is mentioned in many places on the internet, but mostly blogs. It seems the Indian DRDO has released early plans[1][2] and pictures[3] for the boat, but I cannot find the originals, or a reliable source. It also seems that no funding has been approved for the program. Martin451 17:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. Websites linked by Martin451 fall under WP:UGC and thus are not reliable sources.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Websites aren't reliable sources, so fails WP:GNG. Assuming the information is true, it fails WP:CRYSTALBALL. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.