Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bat Bitch
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bat Bitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of WP:GNG. No references, no references found online except IMDB, which exists for every film. Not even the actors, directors, producers or distributors seem to have any notability. The only notable matter is the franchise it parodies, which is one of the most famous in popular culture and of which there are many more notable parodies than this one.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete A completely non-notable porn film. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – I don't see any evidence that this film was ever even mentioned in any RS. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 23:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Porn parody of a mainstream film of the same year, a routine porn practice. Aside from a mention in a porn star's obituary,[1] reliable sources appear to have nothing to say about this film, making this a run-of-the-mill porno. No serious claim of meeting WP:NFILM. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as there is a lack of coverage in reliable sources, for example there are no external reviews listed at IMDb and no entry at all at Rotten Tomatoes, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not a notable film by the looks of it. Nor does it have sources to say otherwise.KingofGangsters (talk) 23:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails all notability tests. — Ched (talk) 02:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.