Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beguni (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beguni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was previously nominated at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Beguni

This article is practically abandoned, has had and been tagged as having no sources since August 2012, and is for all intents and purposes an abandoned stub with insufficient information to warrant it's inclusion as an article at this time. Cat-five t c ---- 22:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would it not be better just adding sources, rather than deleting it. Having a look around the firmament, there is valid sources available. scope_creep talk 00:28 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Weak keep - A valid cuisine entry, albeit poor sourced. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep per sources added to the article. A viable option is to rename the article Aubergine fritters and expand it to include more content about aubergine (eggplant) fritters, particularly since sources are available for this food in abundance. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename as per Northamerica1000. The google search shows quite a few web citations. jmcw (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - That being said I found literally thousands of recipes, which do not confer notability unto them selves. But with that many recipes, there has to be more information about the subject. If valid, reliable sources cannot be located, I would suggest redirecting to Eggplant or fritters. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looks good to me. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the merits. No question that there are sources sufficient to indicate some notability. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.