Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicycle Thieves (2010 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycle Thieves (2010 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Double or Nothing (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Across the Street (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Previously deleted by PROD, there is no assertion of notability here for a short film that doesn't exist yet and is unlikely to be notable when it does. Two other films by the same group are attached to this AfD - one makes a vague assertion of notability that it was shown at Cannes, but even that is unsourced and even if it was, that alone is unlikely to pass the bar of notability. Black Kite 23:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Not likely to ever be notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, per nom. If they ever win multiple Oscars, or perhaps a few break box-office records, then they could be recreated. But that's not likely going to happen, is it? Lord Spongefrog (review) (I am Czar of all Russias) 19:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not currently notable, if any of these do end up becoming worthy of an article they can be created then. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of significant third-party coverage or any other citations to establish notability. --EEMIV (talk) 02:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –MuZemike 02:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note – this was never listed on any of the AFD pages when first nominated for deletion. Will now be listed at WP:AFD/T. Please allow the standard discussion length to happen from today's timestamp. –MuZemike 02:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per failing the notability test. ArcAngel (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 23:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.