Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Thompson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g4 per most recent AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brook Thompson. NawlinWiki 19:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Thompson

Brooke "Pumkin" Thompson does not pass WP:BIO and thus should not have her own wikipage. She has done nothing of note other that lose two reality shows. In addition, this page has been deleted per AfD in the past, and she has not done anything of note since then. There was also never a deletion review for this page. Gamer83 16:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as {{db-repost}} if it's a repost. Otherwise, vanilla delete as failure of WP:BIO. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 16:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
N Speedy Delete per repost. AFD deleted just a couple days ago. VanTucky ^(talk) 16:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT the page Corpx 16:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom or per repost. Oyster guitarist 17:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I almost was going to say redirect to the relevant show, but after really reading over the article, I have to say keep, because the article is rather well presented in that it has nicely arranged pictures, good section division, and external links. Plus, she appears to have been on two shows and so is not known for being on just one show. I think a separate reference section should be added however. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't seem to be too familiar with WP policies. Just because an article passed before doesn't mean that it'll always stay. And furthermore, liking the article isn't good enough. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It was kept in a previous AFD nomination? Are you sure? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 17:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just because I "like" the article; by being on multiple shows, she appears to be notable enough and also because being on two shows would make a redirect to one or the other difficult. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Just to clarify, she has failed this previous AFD, AND, the AFD for the clone article over at Brook Thompson.Gamer83 17:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that, but I think her notability has increased in the past year since the previous discussion. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burn with fire and salt - per WP:BIO. Otto4711 17:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.