Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cake cannon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was BJAODN and delete. Sango123 23:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even though it would solve a lot of our war problems... 0zymandias 08:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Move to BJaODN Seb Patrick 08:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN. Pretty funny nonsense. DarthVader 08:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy to BJAODN. Amusing, but please BJAODN this crap with all speed. One of the IP users responsible was linking to it from other articles.--Drat (Talk) 09:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nonsense. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN Obvious hoax but funny non the less Ydam 10:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subject more suitable for Uncyclopedia rather than WP. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Definite BJAODN I actually laughed out loud when reading this. That's pretty rare for a WP article- and I mean rare for WP articles that are supposed to be jokes. -- Kicking222 16:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Nick C (Review Me!) 17:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki, else delete. See List of weapons that don't exist, but should. - Corbin Be excellent 17:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense --Starionwolf 20:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not funny. Pavel Vozenilek 20:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, absolutely hillarious and true! When you think about this, if we fed cake to everyone then we could get rid of weapons alltogether and be happier overall! Whats better, getting into another war in the middle east or sitting in our lounges eating cake with lower taxes?
- Obvious BJAODN. Grandmasterka 02:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.