Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case of English pronouns (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. - brenneman {L} 03:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A DRV consensus overturned the result of a previous AfD debate. This matter is resubmitted to AfD for fresh consideration. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep perhaps as a harmless redirect to Personal pronouns. Deletion is also acceptable, but certainly not necessary. --Tony Sidaway 17:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - useless redirect BigDT 18:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very, very unlikely search term. Dr Zak 21:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Personal pronouns, nothing is gained by deleting and people type very stange things into search bars all the time. Eluchil404 21:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and keep the Category:Disputes in English grammar cat on the redirect so it remains listed there. It's a good topic, but it's in fact better treated in the Personal pronouns article. I wouldn't mind re-organising the whole set of articles either, refactoring out the English stuff from the Personal pronouns article in an English personal pronouns article, as it is done for other languages. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per BigDT and Dr Zak. As I said in the previous AfD, the subject is already better-treated elsewhere, and this is a very unlikely search term. Willing to go along with a redirect if that's where everyone's leaning, but it's not my first choice. -- H·G (words/works) 06:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or redirect to Personal pronouns. Hardvice 08:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Personal pronouns on the grounds that a redirect takes up little space, and some people will put in a search for the term. However unlikely some editors find that, it will happen - and someone felt strongly enough about the matter to create the article in the first place. SilkTork 14:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.