Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centurion (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centurion (novel)

PROD'ed, does not assert notability. Shawnc (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't assert notability in any way; hasn't received significant third-party coverage (Amazon doesn't count). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - totally non-notable new book, does not assert notability, no reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom Beidabaozi (talk) 05:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Orangemike. Unknown User (talk) 10:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable book. Just because a book is published it doesn't automatically give it notability. PeterSymonds | talk 11:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable book. Attempted to G-search, but all that came up was various booksellers and press releases. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, since notability has not been established. --Abrech (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Leave it! Wikipedia is an information site, so just put some information of the novel down and leave the page here. Rigsy05 (talk) 11:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC) — Rigsy05 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Notification - Rigsy05 typed in a description which he/she claims was a direct (copyvio) transcription of the cover blurb, and removed the AfD notice; when CobaltBlueTony called him/her on it, Tony was told to "sod off." I've rolled back everything Rigsy did (which included changing the author and publisher names, incidentally; maybe it was a different book with the same title?) --Orange Mike | Talk 13:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can we clear out the related articles Macro (protagonist), The Eagle's Conquest, When the Eagle Hunts and Under the Eagle while we're at it? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope - those relate to Centurion (Scarrow novel), a different book altogether (and the source of Rigsy's confusing intervention here). If you want to prod or AfD the Scarrow stuff, that's your business. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.